My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-07-08 TDULLUM
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-07-08 TDULLUM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:22:28 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:22:27 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
was also working with the reality that but for the concurrency requirement on rezoning this is <br />property that would qualify for a water variance to do water catchment, because they have <br />enough rainfall in this area. But because itÓs a rezoning, concurrency kicked in. We were trying <br />to be reasonable. And I think the applicant was trying to the best of their ability to try and <br />comply. I heartily agree that for a private system thatÓs only going to be taking care of six lots <br />having two wells and -. You know, the backup well doesnÓt make a whole lot of sense because <br />itÓs like theyÓre only responsible for themselves. ItÓs not the general public. This isnÓt water that <br />the County has to come truck in. ItÓs, you know, their kuleana. But they were willing to offer <br />those, the two wells and the 15,000- gallon storage tank, so thatÓs why we put it in the condition. <br />But I agree that some of the standards that you have from both the Department of Health as well <br />as Department of Water Supply does not make sense for something thatÓs a six-lot subdivision. <br />WOODWARD: Okay, thank you. Commissioner Domingo. And IÓll address this more when <br />you guys come up. Commissioner Domingo, you had a question? <br />DOMINGO: I was just going to say perhaps when Mr. Fuke and the applicant comes up, you <br />know, we can ask them questions, such as that which you show concerns about. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. All right. Mr. Fuke, if youÓd come up and -. And the applicant, are you <br />with -? No? <br />FUKE: Yes. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. <br />WOODWARD: YouÓre going to be doing the testifying? <br />FUKE: Yes. <br />WOODWARD: Do you swear or affirm to tell the truth today before the Windward Planning <br />Commission? <br />FUKE: Yes, I do, sir. <br />WOODWARD: Okay, and if youÓll give us your name and address and then you may begin. <br />FUKE: Okay. My name is Sidney Fuke. IÓm a planning consultant. IÓve been asked to assist <br />the applicant on this particular project. Seated here is Bob Hogan; and BobÓs the, I guess, the <br />better half or one of the halfs of Stephanie Dullum, the applicant. My business address is 100 <br />Pauahi Street, Suite 212, Hilo, HawaiÒi. IÓd like to, before going on, however, IÓd like to just <br />kind of note that the staffÓs background report and the recommendation, you know, are <br />acceptable. IÓd like to note, however, that on page 1 of the sec <br />there is a reference to Agricultural 20 acre, and I think that was a typographical error. It should <br />be Agricultural 40 acre. ItÓs on the second line of the recommendation. <br />4 <br />EXHIBIT B <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.