Laserfiche WebLink
WOODWARD: All right, do we have any questions? Okay, no, seeing none, thank you <br />gentlemen. You may be seated. Okay, we do have eight people from the public signed up to <br />testify. We would like to give everybody a chance to testify and still get through the agenda. So <br />please limit your testimony to three minutes. And if you run significantly beyond, I will politely <br />ask you to summarize. We have four seats up here, so let me call the first four who have signed <br />up to testify. Thomas Yeh, Myke Metcalf, Brady Metcalf and Jame <br />come up and have a seat. All right, good morning. If I can get you to raise your right hand. Do <br />you swear or affirm to tell the truth today before the Windward Planning Commission? <br /> <br />TESTIFIERS: I do. <br /> <br />WOODWARD: Very good. Okay. And we ask that you give your name and address as you <br />begin your testimony. And, Mr. Yeh, you signed up first so, Tom, youÓve got it. <br /> <br />YEH: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And good morning, Mr. Chairman and Members of the <br />Commission. You know, I often come before this Commission seeking a balance of traffic <br />related conditions, on the basis that sometimes whatÓs suggested is more than whatÓs required of <br />the circumstances. In this event, this particular application really presents a perfect traffic st <br />thatÓs going to arise if the Commission and the Council do not require concurrency of some of <br />these traffic improvements that have been, at least are still being worked out between DOT and <br />the applicant. I want to make clear that the Metcalf Family Limited Partnership on whose behalf <br />IÓm speaking is not opposed to this project. If we had been opposed to this project back in July, <br />back in December Ó09 when we pointed out to the applicant that they had exceeded the time <br />conditions because of the situation of jobs and those kinds of issues, the word state, given the <br />economy -. All that the Metcalf family is doing is asking that you consider before approving this <br />particular extension request, imposing reasonable conditions that are directly tied to the traffic <br />impacts that are related to this project. <br /> <br />A lot has happened since 1991 since this zoning was first started. Now the Metcalf family has <br />been operating Pahoa Auto Parts since 1987. They have a first driveway -. Now what IÓve <br />provided to you was kind of a pictorial exhibit that shows where their first driveway is. <br />Mr. Metcalf, Myke Metcalf will show you some photographs later. But basically there are three <br />things that weÓre saying should be dealt with here. One thereÓs a concurrency ordinance in place <br />which the County adopted. And the reason I provided to you a copy of the pertinent provisions <br />of the HawaiÒi County Code is if you take a look in Section 25-2-44, what it talks about is the <br />CouncilÓs ability to impose conditions on the use of the property. And then if you look at <br />Subsection b, it says changes or alterations of conditions of any change of zone ordinance shall <br />be processed in the same manner as the zone change. You then look at Section 25-2-46 which <br />has these concurrency requirements that weÓve raised. And what it states there is that on <br />Subsection Bagain, this section applies to any application for change of zoning district or for <br />any extension of time to perform a condition of zoning, which is before this Commission now. <br /> <br />So if you read those two sections together, they are exactly designed to fit the situation that we <br />have before you, which is changed circumstances, greatly increased traffic conditions, Pahoa <br />Market place having come in and adding traffic to a currently bad situation. The intersection of <br />3 <br /> EXHIBIT A <br /> <br />