Laserfiche WebLink
WATANABE: Yeah. So what I’m asking is the maker of the motion to withdraw the <br />motion. We’d have another motion that is not compound. <br />IWASHITA: Right now the motion isn’t compound. But my -. <br />WATANABE: No, no, I’ve been corrected it is because it was to continue it to a further <br />hearing. So it’s still compound. So what I’m saying is let’s make it simple. <br />IWASHITA: That’s fine. <br />WATANABE: We throw out the existing motion, yeah, make it singular. All right? So <br />would you be willing to withdraw the motion and make a noncompound motion, meaning we’re <br />just going to hear it first? <br />WOODWARD: Yeah, Mr. Chairman. <br />WATANABE: Thank you very much. <br />WOODWARD: Would you like me to state it? <br />WATANABE: Would you, please. <br />IWASHITA: First, I’m sorry, Mr. Chair. But we haven’t heard from Mr. Kaiser, and <br />this is about -. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Kaiser has been granted standing. <br />IWASHITA: Right, so -. <br />WATANABE: All we’re looking at is whether we want to hear it. That’s not up to <br />Mr. Kaiser or up to the applicant. And, actually, even the Planning Department who may be a <br />party to the contested case hearing can only advise or recommend, but not make the decision <br />itself. So -. <br />IWASHITA: But my point is that we have had Mr. Yuen and the applicant make <br />comment. Mr. Kaiser was not afforded the same opportunity. Our previous vote gave him <br />standing so he’s, in my mind, entitled to at least say I don’t want to say anything, whatever. It’s <br />up to him but we should afford him the opportunity. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Kaiser, you want to take a seat up here? <br />KAISER: My only comment would be that I think it is a complicated issue and I <br />think the Department of Education’s input would be valuable to your decision. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. Okay, so we have all parties providing comment. Okay? <br />And we’re back to Mr. Woodward. <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />17 <br /> <br />