Laserfiche WebLink
WOODWARD: All right, I would move that in the application SPP 08-000051, that this <br />contested case be handled by the Planning Commission. <br />ALAMEDA: Point of order, Mr. Chairman. I think it’s 57, right? I’m checking if the <br />numbers are correct. <br />WOODWARD: Five-one. <br />CAMPBELL: I received 57. <br />DARROW: The correct number is 57. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. It’s says 51 on this, but okay. All right, 57, I stand corrected. <br />DARROW: Just for clarification, the original motion has been withdrawn correct? <br />WATANABE: Correct. The original motion has been withdrawn, so has the amended <br />motion. Well, the amended motion has been withdrawn. The original motion was amended. <br />But we don’t have a second. Would you care to second, Mr. Domingo? <br />DOMINGO: I sure do. I second. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. I don’t suppose we need any further discussion on this. Let’s <br />call for the vote. The new motion is that, it’s singular, yeah, just that the Planning Commission <br />will handle this contested case hearing on its own. <br />IWASHITA: Mr. Chair, point of order? <br />WATANABE: Yes. <br />IWASHITA: The fact that the notice is the wrong number is that a procedural problem, <br />or blemish, and can we proceed irregardless of the -? <br />TORIGOE: Mr. Chairman, I don’t see that as a substantive problem at this point. <br />IWASHITA: Okay. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. <br />IWASHITA: Okay, I just want to keep the record clear. Thank you. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Darrow? <br />DARROW: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The motion before us is that the Planning <br />Commission hear this contested case. With that I’ll take the roll. Commissioner Woodward? <br />WOODWARD: Aye. <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />18 <br /> <br />