My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-07-15 GOLDING
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-07-15 GOLDING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:30:27 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:30:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
use amplification here to hear each other. And prior to their acquiring the property there was a <br />Southcoast Bar right adjacent that had burned down and evidently that is going to raise again <br />from the ashes. And well have to contend with whatever noise factors that will create and <br />hopefully well be able to inhibit some of the noise factors that used to be rampant in the <br />neighborhood when they did exist. So, we are planning something that is quite quiet but we <br />want to be in the normal range of a sound activities. We dont want to not be able to use public <br />address systems in a balanced way. Maybe theres a way of determining the amount of decibels <br />that we would be permitted to use, because not being able to use electronic equipment to some <br />extent itd be quite restrictive and inhibit the programs that are planned. Were not planning <br />rock group concerts or casual entertainment. We will have whatever the community really <br />wants. And were pretty good neighbors. And we know a lot of people in the neighborhood and <br />we wouldnt want to offend those people on any regular basis. So, I dont know how you would <br />want to address that but I think just shutting the door on public address and so forth seems a bit <br />severe. Do you want me to continue on? Okay. And then we get to the issue of the highway <br />access,whichwouldbeabighurdleforyoutoleapoverwithus.Butwerethinkinginfairly <br />long terms and the community is changing quite at a rapid rate and there is nothing there in the <br />community like what we will be providing, and those things that we will be providing are really <br />needed and wanted in the community. We dont have a township and we dont have- we have a <br />bedroom community or we have people living and working out of their houses and subsistence <br />exists and we have people doing all kinds of things in Ocean View. And there is no central <br />magnet for interaction. So as the park develops it needs the support of the community and we <br />become more of a gateway community. Our role may evolve to where we would like it to go, <br />which would really be in the public interest. And so at this point were just asking dont close <br />the door on that possibility and let the State Highway determine at the point that they would <br />consider highway access. And in the meantime we would like to be able to have our fire lane go <br />from street to street with a locked gate and leave it that way until we have proved ourselves to be <br />of sufficient importance in serving the community that the highway would entertain some form <br />of access. This is a leap that would take some thinking Im sure. But were thinking in terms of <br />very long term planning; and if you put a restriction on it at this stage the highway is not going to <br />give us access until we are developed and have proved our role in the community. And whether <br />they would give it then or not is still questionable but the possibility does exist. That could <br />evolve and if it does it would be in the public interest to do so. Where now it appears that it does <br />not, so I dont know if you have to make a determination or not on that matter because the <br />highway is not going to give us access. But if you leave the issue of the fire lane and the future <br />highway access to the Departments that are concerned we will have to conform to what they <br />would require. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you Mr. Roland. Commissioner Siracusa you have some questions <br />at this time? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes. One thing about the highway its right, the highway belongs to the <br />State, its not our highway. If they say no access then we dont have any say in that really except <br />to put it as a condition of the permit. So, youre really trying to convince the wrong body as far <br />as that goes. As far as the noise impact to prohibit the use of amplification devices completely. <br />All right here, were using them right now, Im speaking into an amplification device right and <br />so is Mr. Roland and I was having extreme trouble hearing him or understanding what he was <br />EXHIBIT B <br />10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.