My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-07-15 GOLDING
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-07-15 GOLDING
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:30:27 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:30:16 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GRAHAM:Yeah I had a little follow-up I think for Commissioner Siracusa when she <br />spoke about the highway. And, I understood what Mr. Roland said a little bit differently than the <br />way I think she took it. I think he was saying we have the County involved which is us and then <br />theres the State Department of Transportation, and I think what he was saying is if we the <br />County feel like its important there not be access to Highway 11 then we could put it in a <br />condition like what we have here recommended. But what hes saying is if we as the County are <br />not concerned about that where its only up to the State he would prefer that we dont put it in <br />our conditions so that in the future whatever they may negotiate with the State doesnt become <br />problematic because of some conditions we put in. Is that correct? <br />ROLAND:Thats very correct. Thank you. <br />GRAHAM:So I think thats the issue we have to feel- look at is, are there real <br />concerns that we have so that we want to put in our own condition about Highway 11. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you Commissioner Graham. Mr. Roland I think we left off at Page <br />4.Isthereanythingelseyoudliketodirectusto? <br />ROLAND:WellIthinkyeahthatwasonIthinkpage3.Page4.ExcusemeIm <br />sorry. Page 4 we get into at the very top a 10-foot planting screen easement abutting the <br />highway along mauka side of the site. We dont really have much of a problem with that. We <br />dont want to look at the highway anymore than the highway wants to look at us. But that is the <br />one place on the property where we will have sweeping coastal (inaudible) and it doesnt exist <br />anyplace else on the property and we want to be able to take advantage of that as well. <br />YUEN:Im sorry I didnt hear what you just said. <br />ROLAND:We would like to take advantage as well. <br />YUEN:The sentence before that. <br />ROLAND:We dont have any objection to a 10-foot screen along the highway but we <br />would, were a little apprehensive about the commercial zoning requirements that would be <br />required for landscaping because we want to really do a regional landscape that would be the <br />development of whats appropriate in the woodland aspect and enhance that. And, the way the <br />land is laid out and some of the pallings that are just beyond it actually mitigate a lot of the <br />problems that you would normally be concerned with. And, the property thats to the west is <br />currently on the market and being offered for sale. And we dont know who is going in there. <br />We might want to be more buffered from them than they would want to be buffered from us. <br />But were country people in the sense that we do work well with neighbors and we are <br />community oriented and we have a resource capability of planting to resolve problems with <br />neighbors. And if we have to offer trees or plants to neighbors to help screen things better and if <br />they are willing to do that we would certainly be willing to do that also. So again were asking <br />rather than you impose what would normally be required in a developed area if you look at this <br />more like a place that hasnt been developed yet that we could do a naturalistic landscaping job <br />EXHIBIT B <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.