My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-07-20 TRoyal
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-07-20 TRoyal
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 8:43:30 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 8:43:26 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WATANABE:Mr. Salavea -? <br />SALAVEA:Yes. <br />YUEN:Can I jump in? <br />SALAVEA:Yes, go ahead. <br />YUEN:Thank you. Just so the Commission, just for the understanding of <br />the Commission about why it’s not necessary to spell this out in all the permits -. For this <br />project they have an approved Preservation Plan. Mr. Kennedy can give you more <br />details. Invariably, the Preservation Plan will include the buffers for the sites and how <br />they are to be established prior to construction. So we have a condition in this permit that <br />the sites are to be preserved. And all of the things about making sure that the, and you’ve <br />seen this in construction sites, the yellow tape being up, all of that is contained in the <br />Preservation Plan. <br />SALAVEA:Thank you, Mr. Director. Follow-up to that, so in terms of the <br />covenants, it’s not necessary for a covenant to specify the responsibilities -? <br />YUEN:It’s in the Preservation Plan that is binding upon the Applicant. <br />SALAVEA:Okay. Thank you. <br />WATANABE:I believe we had discussions about that and they did indicate, <br />Mr. Kennedy, I believe it is, did indicate that the follow-up maintenance would be the <br />responsibility of the future owners; and so it would be written into the covenant, and I <br />would think that that’s sufficient. In addition, you know, as I mentioned earlier, it would <br />seem that the Judd Trail that we’re speaking about now is barely touching this property if <br />at all and they agreed to a 10-foot buffer, besides which there is an additional building <br />setback to that, so I don’t really envision bulldozers going through that area as far as the <br />Judd Trail is concerned. The rest is an archaeological preserve anyway except for the, I <br />think it was 40-foot driveway entrance. So, you know, it would appear that all the <br />conditions that are set here would protect whatever is remaining quite handily, or at least <br />to my satisfaction. Any further discussion? Mr. Salavea? <br />SALAVEA:No. <br />WATANABE:If there isn’t, can I get a motion, please? Oh, excuse me, well, you <br />may be seated. <br />IWASHITA:Mr. Chair. <br />WATANABE:Yes, Mr. Iwashita? <br />EXHIBIT A <br />24 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.