Laserfiche WebLink
learning will come from restoration, yeah, restoration. And my question is, do you think <br />that there is some learning to be gained from having this property restored, even if there <br />are I guess, maybe, little left in, you know -? <br />KANAHELE:And I appreciate the question. ThereÓs a lot of things that, thereÓs <br />some things we know about, that they had a heiau that they called Puuhonua, and <br />Keakealani herself was a Puuhonua. And, so, we know that kind of thing about, we know <br />specifics about Keakealani, what her genealogy was, we know that Òcause her genealogy <br />was repeated over and over. We donÓt know why. The why is not, is what is not written <br />down. And, so, the why is that kind of information we need to, is why a lot of places get <br />built, because people donÓt know why; and thatÓs the kind of inf <br />learn from, the why. <br />TOGASHI:And I guess my question, again, do you think we can gain anything <br />from having the proposed site in question? <br />KANAHELE:We can gain a lot -. <br />TOGASHI:Restoring the proposed site? <br />KANAHELE:From restoration of both sites. <br />TOGASHI:And the proposed site in question? <br />KANAHELE:And the proposed site. <br />TOGASHI:Okay. Thank you very much. <br />KANAHELE:And the lower site. <br />SPRINGER:Madam Chair? <br />KANAHELE:Thank you. <br />GIFFIN:Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:Aloha, kaua. <br />KANAHELE:Aloha, kaua. Paka pakiki pakaheaanu (phonetic). <br />SPRINGER:Based on your most recent comments that it is not only the PoÒe <br />HawaiÒi, the people of HawaiÒi, that benefit from maintaining se <br />attentiveness to the land, is it your opinion that there is a compelling public interest that is <br />served by the re-dignification, by restoring the functionality of the site called <br />Kaluaokalani in its entirety? <br />29 <br /> <br />