My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-07-28 TBLASMAN (4)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-07-28 TBLASMAN (4)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:00:34 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:00:08 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
107
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YUEN:To the last question, no. To the first question, having gone around and <br />looked at lots of plants and lots of landscaping. <br />VITOUSEK:And so having driven around and looked at plants and landscaping is what <br />gives you the expertise to, to critic the landscape architectÓs testimony, is that correct? <br />YUEN:Yes. <br />VITOUSEK:So then based on the, on the recommendation that you made yesterday, <br />that you were recommending denial of the application because of, because you doubted <br />that the plan proposed by the landscape architect could effect a complete visual screening <br />between the project and the Keakealaniwahine Complex, was that based on your, on your <br />driving around and looking at landscape? Is that whatÓs the basis of your conclusion, that <br />the plan was inadequate and that you would make a denial, or recommend denial because <br />youÓve driven around and looked at landscape? <br />YUEN:IÓve also stopped not just driven around, stopped, looked at various sites <br />that are landscaped with native and non-native trees, and paced off the distances between <br />trees, paced off distances of, that were planted and seen the visual effect. <br />VITOUSEK:Have you offered any evidence as to the, as to those particular areas or <br />issues, or what youÓve done, or this is just your own assessment conducted outside the <br />record that youÓre relying on in terms of making a recommendation? <br />YUEN:ItÓs my own assessment, yes. <br />VITOUSEK:And itÓs not apparent on the record of this contested case hearing, isnÓt <br />that correct? I mean, your assessment is, but the basis for it? <br />YUEN:No. <br />VITOUSEK:That is, no, it is not apparent on the record? <br />YUEN:No. <br />VITOUSEK:Mr. Yuen, in reaching your recommendation, and when we <br />the sections of Hawaii Revised Statutes, Chapter 205A, you were relying on sections of <br />205A(2) which related to protection of cultural and historical sites, isnÓt that correct? <br />YUEN:Yes, in part. <br />VITOUSEK:Okay. And what else were you relying on 205A(2)? Were there any other <br />parts of the statute that you were relying on? <br />YUEN:There are parts that refer to recreational opportunities. <br />15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.