Laserfiche WebLink
at that time, that the site, the Blasman property at that time in 1980, no longer had any <br />physical features remaining on it. But there was still this, there were similar, I would say <br />similar sentiments of concern. There was not, the Planning Comm <br />decision one or two meetings to clear up some of the issues. There was not a contested <br />case hearing requested, and the application was ultimately approved. I donÓt think there <br />was any particular landscaping plan with that, no. <br />GIFFIN:ThatÓs what I wanted to know. If so, what was the plan, and Î <br />YUEN:And then the permit lapsed and was revoked around, there wa <br />extension granted, and then it lapsed and was revoked within a few years. <br />GIFFIN:So, at that time, would it have been a 10-year application for, time limit <br />for the Applicant to act? <br />YUEN:It was much less than that. I donÓt remember the exact timeframes, but it <br />was much less than 10 years. <br />GIFFIN:So it was in the Ò80s then when it lapsed? <br />YUEN:It was in the Ò80s when it lapsed, yes. <br />GIFFIN:Okay. And in all of that research, you didnÓt see, see any evidence of <br />mention of plants that were germane to the area that were common during the period that <br />you were speaking, 1778? <br />YUEN:I donÓt think there was a landscaping condition with the 1980 permit. <br />GIFFIN:Okay. Thank you. Mr. Togashi? <br />TOGASHI:I do have a question. IÓm sort of, I guess maybe, sort of confused by your <br />testimony. <br />In your testimony yesterday, you spoke about the limitations of the size of this lot. And <br />you mentioned that it was, in terms of mauka to makai, the length of the property is about <br />200 feet, you said in your testimony. <br />YUEN:On the north end, which is the left-hand side here, the Kailua side of the <br />property. I think thatÓs correct. Hang on a second. <br />TOGASHI:ItÓs not mauka to, you werenÓt referring to a mauka to makai distance in <br />terms of the length of the lot? I guess going from the, the east boundary to the west <br />boundary, is that what you spoke of, 200 feet? <br />YUEN:No, I was thinking mauka to makai. I might be wrong on thi <br />here is blued out. I think it might be 260 feet. <br />7 <br /> <br />