Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK:Excuse me, I object to the form of question because I think it assumes a <br />state of facts not in evidence that Historic Preservation didn't make any requirement. I mean I <br />think that mis-states their -. <br />GIFFIN:You know what? <br />DAVID:Excuse me, recommendation. <br />GIFFIN:Maybe you could just state that you don't know or that there are no <br />requirements that you know of or something like that. <br />BLECK:I don't know the specific number of foot requirement, if a <br />DAVID:Thank you. <br />GIFFIN:You're welcome. Mikahala. <br />M.ROY:Speaking to that very requirement, I think we are all in the process, the <br />communities are, with the State Historic Preservation on matters <br />record. <br />I have a large, a long question for you. So would you begin to discuss again the plans to build <br />each building, how high they will be, and from the ground up what you plan to do by your plan. <br />VITOUSEK:Okay. I object to the question. It's beyond the scope of the direct <br />testimony. In other words, she questions -. You know, we offered the witness' testimony. She <br />thoroughly cross-examined the witness. The witness is recalled for the supplemental testimony. <br />The scope of cross-examination is limited to the scope of the supplemental testimony, and <br />starting from the beginning and describing the whole project is really not appropriate. <br />M.ROY:Ms. Giffin? <br />GIFFIN:Mikahala, may I make a suggestion? Would you rephrase your question <br />so that it's within the format of what was just expressed. Thank you. <br />M.ROY:Thank you. So would you speak to the height, again, of th <br />will be built on the property. <br />GIFFIN:Mikahala, since that wasn't presented in oral testimony o <br />testimony this morning, that kind of exceeds the bounds of quest <br />his opinion. <br />M.ROY:May I ask your opinion on your plans to-date for the height or the plans <br />for this development? <br />22 <br /> <br />