Laserfiche WebLink
VITOUSEK:I'm sorry, that -. For one, that question is very vague and ambiguous. I <br />mean just ask your opinion on the plans for the building is not -. I mean, I think that's <br />ambiguous. It's beyond the scope of the direct examination. <br />GIFFIN:Thank you very much. Mikahala, maybe we can go back to y <br />question regarding the height and you can relate it to its relevance, to what he may have said this <br />morning. And if you want to, you can refer to his testimony. <br />M.ROY:Thank you. In the testimony that you gave regarding the m <br />that particular building that you've spoken on today, would you describe the -, then the <br />particulars on that particular building for height. <br />BLECK:Well, the height of the building remains unchanged. <br />M.ROY:And what is that, please? <br />BLECK:Thirty-five feet to the ridge. <br />M.ROY:Is that from the -? Ridge is what? <br />BLECK:The top of the highest roof. <br />M.ROY:And what is the lowest point from which you're working in that <br />measurement? <br />BLECK:The level of the driveway. <br />M.ROY:Will there be sub-movement down below that for this partic <br />Will there be excavation into the ground? <br />BLECK:No. <br />M.ROY:Will there be a basement? <br />BLECK:Well, technically speaking, the parking garage is, per the Uniform <br />Building Code, is described as a basement. <br />M.ROY:Thank you. Another question. I have a question on why is this property <br />owner imposing on the adjacent land by trees that obviously pervade into neighboring area is my <br />question from the picture. Could you speak on that? <br />BLECK:Well, that's more of a landscape architect's question. <br />M.ROY:Okay. <br />BLECK:I believe. <br />23 <br /> <br />