Laserfiche WebLink
KUBOTA:Mr. Stirling, I hate to be categorized as an irresponsibl <br />Commissioner. I grant you that the traffic problem that you mentioned on Palani, all the <br />Commissioners here have been, as far as weÓve been sitting on the Commission, been <br />aware of it. And we have consciously asked our departments to look into it and bring <br />update to improvements, but heretofore nothing has come about. Now, I would like to <br />have our Planning Director respond to Mr. StirlingÓs characterization of the planning as <br />well as the CommissionersÓ responsibilities. Short of putting a moratorium on all further <br />developments, I donÓt know how else we can do that; and I donÓt want it to be on my <br />shoulders entirely. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN:Sure. This is really an overall question on the island and not just in <br />this particular location. My question is if you keep this area and they develop it at 3-acre <br />lots, then what happens? If we want to look at the ultimate big picture, thereÓs no <br />ultimate control on the number of people who moved to the island or the number of <br />people who moved to Kona. Simply, there are still vacant properties for people to move <br />to. And the question is where theyÓre going to move to. If you have an actual, if you <br />actually have a moratorium on the creation of new building sites, the law of supply and <br />demand means that the building sites that presently exist will be bid up in price. And <br />what will then happen is that thereÓs a ripple effect and the people who donÓt have money <br />have to move farther and farther away from the places that they work. For example, and, <br />ultimately, the ultimate place for people to live becomes Ocean View and they drive <br />maybe 40 miles to where they work instead of 10 miles to where t <br />Now this proposed subdivision, I will not make any pretenses, is <br />affordable housing subdivision. ItÓs, thereÓll be Level 1, three of the lots will be more <br />expensive than the one-acre lots that they propose to make; but thereÓll still not be <br />anything that people would consider affordable. <br />But we really donÓt have, we donÓt have a situation or the luxury of saying that simply by <br />not creating more building sites we have fewer people or we have less traffic. The <br />control that we have in planning is primarily over where people go and not the ultimate <br />level of development on this side of the island. <br />Getting to the more specific issues, the only, I have a question how much a moratorium <br />on rezoning in the Kalaoa area, the area along Mamalahoa above Palani, would change <br />the traffic situation on Palani. There are a lot of people that use Palani and a lot of <br />people, a lot of itÓs a cross-island traffic, a lot of its people coming, a lot of it is people <br />using Palani as an artery, rather than just people coming into subdivisions on the road. <br />Certainly, Palani needs improvement. <br />I think we circulated to the Commission about a year-and-a-half ago a list of road <br />projects in Kailua-Kona that included improvements to Palani. The major improvement, <br />the actual, the biggest problem with Palani is it has got bad alignment. Ultimately, it has <br />13 <br /> <br />