My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-06-02 DRAFT Joint Meeting Exh B (Proposed Amendments to PC Rules 8 & 9)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2023
>
2023-06-02 Joint
>
2023-06-02 DRAFT Joint Meeting Exh B (Proposed Amendments to PC Rules 8 & 9)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/6/2023 8:07:50 PM
Creation date
7/6/2023 8:07:12 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PAISHON-DUARTE: Second, Paishon-Duarte. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay, we have a motion on the table then do we. We that happen, <br /> where are we — <br /> LIN: I heard you but if you could repeat your motion. <br /> DEFRANCO: Yeah, my motion is sort of table where we're at in this process and <br /> make a motion to discuss to move us backwards a little bit to discuss amongst each other. So it <br /> isn't resting on someone's boat. I don't know how you want me to put it. I make a motion to <br /> open a discussion before we finish the vote. <br /> SALAS-FERGUSON: Good morning Chair, Vice Chair DeFranco. This is Sinclair Salas- <br /> Ferguson, Deputy Corporation Counsel. So, I have a few suggestions. What I'm seeing is that <br /> Commissioner Paishon-Duarte has some further concerns with I think it's in Rule 8-10, the <br /> waiver of public hearing and action. I think that was her concerns. So, what we can do I think <br /> the best way to satisfy everyone's interests is it seems like some Commissioners have more <br /> questions on 8-10. So, the previous motion to approve the amendments failed. So, we're back at <br /> square one. So, I think if the Commissioners have more questions about that right now would be <br /> the time to ask those questions and then once the Commissioners have finished asking all of their <br /> questions of the Department regarding that specific section or any other section that any <br /> Commissioner has in questions about. Then somebody can make a motion to either approve the <br /> amendments or deny the amendments and once that's seconded then the Commissioners can <br /> discuss the amendments and then they can make further amendments to the motion. <br /> For example, all these amendments that are put before the Commission today. The Commission <br /> doesn't have to accept or deny all of them together, they can accept some and deny some and <br /> also the Commission can suggest further amendments to the proposed amendments. But if those <br /> further amendments substantially alter the amendments as they are right now, we'd have to <br /> provide further notice to the public and continue decision making on those amendments. So, <br /> right now I suggest that you guys go back into fact finding and ask the Department to clarify any <br /> concerns that you may have. <br /> DEFRANCO: Thank you, those were some things that I didn't know we had <br /> options, so appreciate that. <br /> LIN: Okay, so, Commissioners any further questions for staff? Go <br /> ahead Commissioner Paishon-Duarte. <br /> PAISHON-DUARTE: Thank you and thank you to all the staff for helping to guide us to <br /> this conversation today. Director Kern if I might ask you. Can you please again, how is the <br /> proposed amendment to waive a public testimony while it's very far and few between instances <br /> where this will come into effect. How will this benefit the public and how will this benefit you <br /> as Director and how will this benefit the public? <br /> 11 <br /> EXHIBIT B (DRAFT) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.