My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010-08-12 THU HONUA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2010
>
2010-08-12 THU HONUA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:22:00 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:21:58 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? Mr. Chairman? <br />WOODWARD: Yes. <br />DOMINGO: Point of personal privilege? <br />WOODWARD: Yes. <br />DOMINGO: Can we have a five-minute recess? <br />WOODWARD: Sure. <br />ROHR: Why don’t you -. Okay. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. And we really would like to have you summarize, okay, if you would. <br />ROHR: Sorry. <br />WOODWARD: We’ll take five minutes. <br />RECESSEDiSgdBg`hqb`kkdc`rgnqsqdbdrr`s0091/`-l- <br />RECONVENEDiSgdlddshmfqdbonvened at 11:25 a.m. <br />WOODWARD: All right. Ms. Rohr, did you want to give us a brief summarization? <br />ROHR: Okay. One, I only received this Hu Honua’s objections a half an hour ago. One of the <br />things that they stated was I didn’t testify that the hearing was untimely at the time. I heard other <br />people state that the application was incomplete. I have three minutes, I’m not going to repeat <br />what someone else said. It’s not a requirement that I testified about it, it’s just that somebody <br />testified about it. I don’t testify about things that someone else testified on. Okay, -. Due <br />process says that I have a right to a full hearing. <br />The Planning Department exceeded their authority when they scheduled the first hearing. It’s <br />unlawful rule making under HRS 91. Your rules, you have to give full consideration to all your <br />rules. And if a mistake was made we have to figure out the fastest way to get back and start over <br />again, the fastest without costing a lot of public money. Part of the problem was Hu Honua, as I <br />understand it from knowledge and information I’ve received, PCSI stated that it was Hu Honua <br />who somehow pressured this young archaeologist to put “Final Report,” and which they sent to <br />you. That was a fabrication. You cannot allow people to fabricate just to get a hearing. No <br />matter what happens today it’s on the table what has occurred, what mistakes have been made. <br />Do you want to decide now how we go forward, or do you want to wait until a contested case <br />hearing in October, and then more hearings, and then a decision, and then a court case, and then <br />you come back around, and you come back to the same point? <br />13 <br />EXHIBITC <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.