2010-08-12 THU HONUA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I think the Planning Director knows the truth. She knows where she stands and I don’t -. I guess maybe she can’t just say, oh, yeah, we realize now that they didn’t meet the number 5, just the 9-11(b)(5) historic preservation procedures, in hindsight -- you know, oh, yeah, we were trying to meet that 45-day deadline on the, had to get to hearing. Well, we just discussed why 45 days is not enough time; and people deserve a full hearing, including me whose business is going to go under if you pass this. As it stands, the permit as it stands, the permit says 27 times, or the historic literature review says 27 times that there are no historic properties. The permit states about ten times there’s no historic properties. There are historic properties. It’s a factual error. I haven’t seen them try to amend the permit or respond to any of these things. For three months I’ve been talking, I’ve been writing, I’ve been calling, I’ve been trying to get answers. And nobody, because it’s a contested case, it’s we don’t want to talk about it. Well, that’s going to be a long road back to the beginning. So I think Hu Honua should do the right thing now, admit that mistakes were made and agree to start over next month, which would be the fastest way to do this. Just withdraw the application and agree to start over, rather than fighting through six months to get back around to the same old thing. These errors aren’t going to go away. They’re not something that you can -. Okay, that’s it. I’ll summarize. Your own rule says that you have to give common meaning to words and that you must, you must look at all your rules. Okay? So you can’t interpret also, that’s the other thing. Chapter, or, HRS 91 states what a rule means, and it’s written in this document. If you’d like to consider this I will accept that you don’t make a decision today. If you need more time to go over this, decide the implications, if Hu Honua would like more time, that’s fine. WOODWARD: All right. Do we have any questions? DOMINGO: One question. WOODWARD: Yes, Commissioner Domingo. DOMINGO: Ma’am, you made reference to PCSI -. ROHR: Uh huh. DOMINGO: Exerting pressure on this individual with regards to completing their report and - then -. ROHR: Right, putting “Final” on it. DOMINGO: Yeah, “Final Report.” And you further stated that that report was fabricated? ROHR: No, the report is not fabricated. The page that says “Final” on it, you can’t put final on an archaeological review report unless the State Historic Preservation Division agrees that it’s a final. And they were told that it was, that it had inaccuracies. DOMINGO: So that’s, so when you said that it was fabricated -. 14 EXHIBITC