2010-08-12 THU HONUA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

on. They purposely did not label the structures that were along the shoreline setback area that sgdxlqdtrhmf+sg`ssgdxvhkkadconstructing new pollution entrapment structures as part of their NPDES permit. Each time somebody uses a new etdk+xntlkkg`ud`mdvonkkts`ms-Sghrshld hslrvnncbghor-Sgdxlqdfnhmfsng`ud`rgatssgdxlqdfnhmfsnhave woodchips also. That qdpthqdrsghmjhmf+`mcsgdxlqdfnhmf to have logs rolling around. I have photos of logs on the edge of the pali already. The shoreline survey, because they did not admit they were doing construction in the shoreline setback and that they needed to recon -, or to construct a new device where the old wooden flume is, they misled the Planning Department on the shoreline survey issue. What the plot plan complaint or letter that I wrote, which is the second item attached, I attached a map that @B+hrhs@BHR+kdslrrdd+@BRH+oqnuhcdcoqdo+Hb`mlsqdmember their acronym, what it means any more, but they were the ones who owned the rights to turn on the switch before Hu Honua. On that application it has the top of pali. I made a list of all the things that are not on the plot plan, but definitely a requirement is to put all the boundaries on, and the top of pali is the boundary towards the makai side. This map shows that not only is their map different and has less labels but the top of pali is really the hrrtd-Sgdxchcmlsotsnmsgdrgnqdkhmdrdsa`bj line. SgdxchcmlsotsnmsgdRs`sdK`mcTrdAntmc`qxKhmdvghbgvgdmsgdxcn,-Adb`trdsgdqdlr an aerial photograph, a 1990 boundary interpretation from the LU the makai side, leaving portions of the settlement pond in the Agricultural district. The PREP v`rmls`akdsnfdssgdhqrnkhcwaste permit because they could not get a P-5 Form, which is the pre-requisite for applying for a solid waste permit - because we told, because of years of following up on this particular plant and showing that they were not complying with land use k`vr-HmnsgdqvnqcrsgdxlqdcnhmfHmctrsqh`l activity on Agricultural land, which is not authorized by 205-4 or the Zoning Code. WOODWARD: Let me just interrupt you for a sebnmc-Vg`svdlqdgdqd for really is to decide upon granting you status, not specifics -. ROHR: The timing issue? WOODWARD: Not specifics of the application itself. QNGQ9Sghrhrmlssgdrodbhehbr-Hslr`antsshlhmf-Sgd`pplication must, I put on here each of your rules regarding application, the applicant shall submit the following to the Director, a plot plan of the property drawn to scale with all existing and proposed structures, and other information necessary, to make a proper determination of the impacts relative to the specific request. In here you have a letter that is just about that issud-HslrMn-1+`ss`bgldms-@mcH wrote it out. I was in conversation with Daryn Arai from before the hearing, first hearing. But, anyway, I had written it all out why that, vgxsgdxchcmlslddssg`sqdpthqdldms- The application itself indicates wh`slrdwodbsdcsnadnmsg`splan, and it includes boundaries. 5 EXHIBITC