2010-08-12 THU HONUA - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

You have to put all the boundaries of the property. Top of pali is the seaward boundary of that particular parcel, that in East G`v`hkhsg`shrsgdrgnqdkhmd-I am on the board of Public Access RgnqdkhmdG`v`hkh'O@RG(`mcvdcd`kvhsgrgnqdkhmdhrrtdr:`mcHludqdrd`qbgdchs`mcHlud heard Bobby Jean say that in Windward, or maybe it was Christopher Yuen, in Windward G`v`hkhsgdsnoneo`khhrsgdrgnqeline. So what the surveyors do is they go over the, I used to sell real estate, what they do is they go over the pali as far as they can and they take points; and then they say from this point to this point along the top of the pali shoreline; and they cnmls`bst`kkxl`od`bgo`qsnts-Atsadb`trdI could find a map that shows that the pali undermines structures on the property, because I was able to photograph the wooden flume existing in 2005 and in a pile of ruins at the bottom of the pali in 2010 -. The Planning Department prematurely scheduled the hearing. Itv`radb`trd+hsv`rmlsdudm th reasonable. They sent out requests for comments. They wrote the letter on the 11 of March. th People received it on the 15 of March. They asked for comments to be received back by the thth 8ne@oqhk-Sg`sv`rmlsdudm2/c`xr-@mcax+nmsgd04 maybe it would have been about th 30 days. But they actually submitted their ad or their advertisement of the hearing on the 15 th to the paper and it was published on the 17ne@oqhk-Rnhscndrmlsdudmrddlrhmbdqd- I know what they were battling though. Therdlr`34,c`xshldkhlhsnmsgd`ldmcldmssn`m SMA and I have written something about that too, which is attached as the third item on here. Hslra`rhb`kkxrs`shmf`kl the facts that the Planning Department determined back in 2003 that they had violated not only the NPDS Permit, and the EPA came in and did a notice of violation/order to comply showing five years worth of violations. And the Planning Department in letters acknowledged, and that they determined that they were in vio -, substantial violations. That means the permit was invalid by its own Condition 8 of the 1985 version of 221. It states thathesgdxcnmlsbnlokxvhsgsgdbnmchshnmrsg`shslrunhc-Sgd1/4@ states that you can amend an SMA Permit, a valid SMA Permit. It does not authorize you to amend a voided permit. DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? WOODWARD: Yes. DOMINGO: Point of order. WOODWARD: Yes. DOMINGO: There are some facts that have been given with regards to timing and the lack of, nqsgdxlqdmns,- ROHR: Just say -. DOMINGO: The timing and lack of certain documents and everything. Now if we, if we give her standing in this particular case, would we not be in essembdbnmehqlhmfsg`svg`srgdlr 6 EXHIBITC