My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-08-22 TYERLICK
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-08-22 TYERLICK
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:25:30 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:25:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
S. YERLICK: There’s a renovation being done on a house up from us. <br />T. YERLICK: And in fact, one of the residents said if they improve the road, there’s <br />possibility that somebody might try to subdivide, and then you would have more houses. And so <br />they are really concerned with the change of the road size because they don’t want more houses <br />and don’t want more traffic there. <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Domingo, follow-up? <br />DOMINGO: I think that’s where we have a problem. If we require the applicant to <br />build or improve the roadway up to their residence, and then in the future someone decides to <br />sell the property and going for a rezoning and establish a number of lots and those lots are sold, <br />how will the Public Works monitor situation and address concerns of traffic going up and down? <br />Would they review that at the time they apply for a building permit? <br />YUEN: No, because they have an existing driveway access, people can build more <br />houses off of that driveway access without changing it at all in the future. Subdivision, unless <br />there were a very substantial variance granted, a subdivision would require considerable <br />improvement to the entire road. The only point I was, the reason I said what I said about <br />building a house and putting in a driveway is to counter the idea that this was an arbitrary <br />improvement that we plucked out the ear. As I said, this is, we understand what the applicant is <br />saying and there is a point to it that it’s a small increase in the traffic of the road, it is something <br />that, the driveway access is considerably less currently than what would be required for a new <br />driveway. So it isn’t something that’s an arbitrary standard; this is a standard for new driveways. <br />You could build on more houses and other things that don’t need anything beyond the building <br />permit off of the existing driveway without ever having to come to Public Works to change the <br />driveway because they already have one. <br />WATANABE: Thank you. Mr. Woodward. <br />WOODWARD: Well, I think what we are dealing with here is an existing roadway that has <br />worked well for the four people that have properties on that roadway. An existing driveway and <br />an existing structure that is not going to be materially changed, and the only thing that’s going to <br />change is they are going to have four rooms for a bed and breakfast. The additional traffic, even <br />if they are full everyday of the year, is going to be minimal. And I can’t see, as I say, I think this <br />is one of the points where government gets a little excessive. You know, just let them do it; it’s <br />not going to hurt anybody. <br />WATANABE: Okay. Ms. Bowman. <br />BOWMAN: Just to reiterate, it’s a precedent setter to me, and it’s – I have no idea, I’m <br />not an engineer – but I’m sure a project like this would be a couple hundred thousands? I don’t <br />EXHIBIT A <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.