Laserfiche WebLink
ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes. So that answers the question about the burials. It does not answer <br />the question about resource gathering. Do you also follow the same general procedure with <br />notices in the OHA newsletter, for example? <br />HAHN:I have not made an effort to, as part of the scope of the inventory survey, <br />Archaeological Inventory Survey, that’s not part of the scope of that requirement. <br />ALAMEDA:Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Well, I was looking at the, I guess it was the Background Report and the <br />part I quoted before about identifying whether under cultural resources, whether there was any <br />attempt made to find out if the area was used for gathering. And there was only one item that I <br />noticed was extremely traditional for gathering. Sure, plumeria blossoms people would go for <br />leis that sort of thing; but I mean, ko`oko`olau was the one that sort of raised the red flag for me <br />since it is used in traditional medicine. And the Background Report did state that, you know, <br />there should be an attempt there to find out if there were native gatherers. I was wondering if <br />you had made the attempt, that’s all. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Fair enough. Other questions? Seeing none -. <br />YUEN:I just want to make a comment. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. <br />YUEN:Commissioner Graham asked a really good question on this Access <br />Management Plan for the Alii Parkway, and I wasn’t aware that there was a possible right-in/ <br />right-out, and this is referred to as the Kingman property access. This is the property that’s <br />immediately to the south of the property that we’re looking at here; and it’s on the map in light <br />green. On the map here it’s to the right of the property that we’re looking at here which has a <br />blue dot. So it’s still zoned Agricultural 5-acres. I suspect that the reason that there’s an access <br />shown here is that the property may not have an access. Once this property, the same ownership <br />extends across Alii Parkway but it may not have an access for the part makai of the Parkway. <br />Unless there’s some access allowed to the Parkway, we would probably not want to have that <br />access. On the other hand, if it was allowed as a right-in/right-out, we would probably want <br />there to be a cross access from this property so that the people in this property could get out on <br />that access as well. <br />We have this covered by a condition. We have a Condition No. 7 that talks about preparing an <br />access and circulation plan for the review and, with providing for inter-connection of adjoining <br />parcels and access to Kahului and Keahole Parkway through Planning Director and Department <br />of Public Works. What I’m alerting the Applicant here, too, is that they need to look carefully at <br />this situation with this Kingman property; and we all need to look carefully at this. If it turns out <br />that it would desirable not to have this right-in/right-out on the Kingman at all, that it becomes <br />essential that we connect the Kingman property through this property, the zoning condition on <br />this property does require that at least one road in the property be public and County-dedicable. <br />So it may be that the end result of this is that that Kingman property connects through this <br />EXHIBIT B <br />12 <br /> <br />