My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006-08-25 D-BAR
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2006
>
2006-08-25 D-BAR
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:29:40 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:29:33 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
TYLER:Yes, sir. You hit that nail right on the head, I believe. And the reason is <br />because the inventory survey deals with what’s actually there. It doesn’t deal with the <br />intangibles that can’t been seen. And so this is what happened in the Ka Pa`akai <br />O Ka `Aina case, which I think you have some familiarity with. And this is also the reason, as <br />clearly stated in your revision of your rules of last January, I believe it was, no, excuse me, 2005, <br />it clearly stated that the purpose was to comply with the Ka Pa`akai as well as the Public Access <br />Shoreline Hawai`i decisions. And I don’t know whether any of you have read them but there’s <br />some pretty good stuff on the website available through the OEQC as well as other places. I <br />can’t explain this very simply. I’m not an attorney so I can’t do that. <br />ALAMEDA:Mr. Salavea, does that answer your question? <br />SALAVEA:Yes. Thank you. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Any specific questions for Mr. Tyler? Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Yes. Mr. Tyler, I have always been very impressed with your attention to <br />detail -. <br />TYLER:Thank you. <br />SIRACUSA:And, once again, I’m impressed. I had been considering offering a <br />condition regarding the cultural resources which would require the Applicant to do outreach <br />through ads in the OHA newsletter and West Hawai`i Today to see if we could generate any <br />legitimate claims for gathering on that parcel. What are your thoughts about such a condition? <br />TYLER:Well, I was, may I answer? <br />ALAMEDA:Sure. <br />TYLER:I heard you speak, ask this question earlier of Dr. Hahn. I thought that <br />was a very novel idea and one that I don’t think has been done.All that’s required under 6E is <br />the publication for a possible descendancywith respect to the burials. And as Mr. Dickler and I <br />were talking at the break, you know, he can’t be expected to know all of these intricacies of the <br />cultural resource protection laws, but you are required as part of the SMA to do this. So perhaps <br />that’s an idea. I think my real answer is, well, if they had done the Cultural Impact Assessment <br />to begin with as required by your rules, we wouldn’t be having this discussion because there’ll <br />probably be people here who would be coming to speak to you about the protection of their <br />traditional and customary rights. I can’t say that unequivocally, but that’s what’s happening in <br />past situations, assuming they’re notified. Thank you. <br />SIRACUSA:That’s a big assumption; and that’s what my concern was while I was <br />considering a possible condition to be required to publish notices to do that kind of outreach to <br />see if we could get that information. <br />TYLER:I think that’s a wonderful idea. I believe that it should be applied across <br />the board to all, not just this applicant; and that’s where, you know, one has to be careful. <br />Because you just don’t do selective, you know, selective conditions and then don’t put it on <br />EXHIBIT B <br />27 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.