My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-08-26 SMA 05-004 Tinguely
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-08-26 SMA 05-004 Tinguely
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:32:31 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:32:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPRINGER:Thank you, thankyou both. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Graham? <br />GRAHAM:Basically I was going to say essentially what the Planning Director said <br />but let me just add on that I know some of the Commissioners are newer Commissioners but <br />at hearings and I can specifically remember a Hilo hearing when we had a request for a <br />standing in a contested case I remember asking at the time is it appropriate to ask the <br />applicant the nature of the impacts that hes concerned about and all like that and the answer I <br />received was essentially no thats not the issue. If the applicant is distinct from the general <br />public and we find it to be so thats not something we need to deal with at this time. So, in <br />fairness to this intervenor, potential intervenor, and then to our past policy Id like to sort of <br />keep that in mind but I also recognize that Mr. Mooers sort of left a question on the table for <br />us where he really explained well the situation and if the Counsel or the Chairman has any <br />otherrecommendationsastohowtodealwiththatiftheressomethingwecanbringintothe <br />mix that would help his concerns Im certainly happy to hear that. But other than that I think <br />the issue on standing is just one of- condition one in the ones that Mr. Torigoe read. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:Yes. My question then would be to the representative from the AOAO <br />group. Having heard the discussion and understanding that there are certain riggers <br />associated with a contested case hearing, rights and also responsibilities do you stand by your <br />petition and do you wish us to move forward? <br />GREEN:Yes I do. Unfortunately once more Im not the best representative of <br />this because I dont have all the information. Mr. Archibald knows much more about this <br />than I do and Im simply here to keep things going and its required. So, one more apology. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Any further questions? Mr. Mooers in reference to the petition do you <br />have any further comments on that? <br />MOOERS:No, I think I was clear that we did not object to standing its just that <br />we request that we look the most expeditious way possible to resolve this because in a way I <br />think this is an abuse of process because were letting a non-SMA issue delay an SMA permit <br />through the contested case. Theyve got every right to ask for standing, we dont object to <br />standing. Im just looking for an expeditious resolution after that point. <br />GALDONES: Thank you Mr. Mooers. Commissioners seeing no further questions a <br />motion is in order to either grant or deny the petition for standing. Commissioner Iwashita? <br />IWASHITA:Thank you Mr. Chair. I move that the petition for standing in a <br />contested case hearing submitted by Steve Green, Board Vice President, Kona Pacific AOAO <br />be granted. <br />EXHIBIT C <br />11 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.