My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-08-31 TSEASCAPE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-08-31 TSEASCAPE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:42:04 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:42:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RHO: Yes, I do. <br />GRAHAM: Yes, Commissioner Rho. <br />RHO: I’m actually reading the minutes from our last meeting; and I don’t <br />know that you have access to it, but it’s on page 6 of Exhibit B. And it’s actually going back to <br />this traffic situation. But Mr. Gimpel talks about the TIAR on page 7. And he says that that <br />traffic report was done, or he refers to it as old, a year and a half years old. So do you folks have <br />a response to that, or his comment about that? <br />DICKLER: Yes. <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Dickler. <br />DICKLER: The report actually was updated in January of 2007. Mr. Gimpel, <br />it references a traffic count from 2005, but the report itself was updated and submitted. The <br />report that was submitted along with the application was done in January of 2007. <br />RHO: And then on page 6 he refers to a single access. So, I kind of <br />missed the discussion, I was distracted. But is there going to be in the future more than one <br />access to that, I don’t want to call it a subdivision but to that property? <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Dickler, go ahead. <br />DICKLER: To the property, after Mr.Gimpel’s comments, we said that we <br />would provide secondary access to the property itself, and then in the future there will be other <br />roadways that are planned in the future to access Kakahiaka Street. So there’s two. <br />RHO: So I guess my real question is whether or not there will be access <br />to Queen K -. <br />DICKLER: Directly? <br />RHO: No, no, I’m not saying directly. But are there going to be other <br />roads that your project can actually access into Queen K without going onto Kaiminani? <br />GRAHAM: Mr. Dickler? <br />DICKLER: At this point, no. There is no other access to Queen K. <br />RHO: No, no, no. But I’m asking in the future. <br />DICKLER: No, there -. <br />RHO: As far as you know there are no plans -? <br />DICKLER: As far as we know there are no plans on the south side of <br />Kaiminani to access directly to Queen K. At some future point the mid-level road, which has a <br />EXHIBIT C <br />8 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.