Laserfiche WebLink
GALDONES:Will the Hawaii County Planning Commission be back in order. Further <br />discussion on this application? <br />ALAMEDA:Question. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Alameda. <br />ALAMEDA:Sure, I might as well get in the mix. I remember as I was chairing this last <br />meeting on this subject, the relocation program from the County, I think I heard correctly it <br />doesnt offer 100 percent. Its 130 percent, is that correct? <br />YUEN:Yes. Its up to 130 percent of assessed, thats the taxed assessed <br />valuation. <br />ALAMEDA:Okay. Thats what I remember. Thank you. <br />SALAVEA:Chair? <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Salavea. <br />SALAVEA:Just, I guess, point of clarification from counsel. Our role as <br />Commissioners on this particular agenda item is to identify whether or not, and you can correct <br />me if Im wrong, whether or not, or to establish if there was adverse impact upon the application <br />to the GAF, is that correct? <br />TORIGOE:Thats the first criterion under Rule 14-8(c)(1), Adverse Impact from the <br />geothermal activities. <br />SALAVEA:And that would help govern our decision whether, or whatever action we <br />did take? <br />TORIGOE:Right. If you think the evidence does not support a finding of adverse <br />impact by the geothermal activities, then, you know, thats the end. You shouldnt go any <br />further. If you think that the evidence shows that there was adverse impact from the geothermal <br />activity, then you can consider if there was, you can award an amount of compensation <br />appropriate for the damage caused by the adverse impact. <br />SALAVEA:All right. That answers my question. Thank you. <br />SPRINGER:Mr. Chair? <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Springer. <br />SPRINGER:To the Director, I think I understood correctly from Mr. Olson that a <br />grievance process did not exist at the time that the grievance occurred, that were being asked to <br />16 <br /> <br />