My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2005-09-02 TMALASEKO2
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2005
>
2005-09-02 TMALASEKO2
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 9:45:54 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 9:45:50 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
that all that they have presented is to the best of their knowledge true and accurate, you know, in <br />a form of oath, then I think that couldnt hurt either. So we can we deal with these things in a <br />fairly informal fashion but try and preserve some of the attention to truthfulness and to the sworn <br />accuracy of the testimony that Commissioner Iwashita has raised. <br />IWASHITA:I have a lawyerly kind of question. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Iwashita, is it going to take a while? Weve been -. <br />IWASHITA:I hope, I dont think so, cause I just, theres a dynamic here between the <br />contested case rule and Rule 14. <br />GALDONES:No, I understand that. But the Commissioners have been here sitting here <br />for a while now and Im prepared to call for a short recess, and continue the dialogue thereafter. <br />Thatsthepurposeofmyask-. <br />IWASHITA:Justforoneortwominutes,Mr.Chair?Isthatokay? <br />GALDONES:Ifyoucouldexpediteit. <br />IWASHITA:Yeah,justoneortwominutes. <br />GALDONES: Im sure the Commissioners would appreciate if you could expedite it. <br />IWASHITA:Thank you. So Im not, because Rule 14 doesnt you know, directly <br />reference the Director, Directors role in implementing the rule, can you explain to me -. I <br />understand youre saying, you know, this is a, youre defining it as a contested case type of <br />matter because it is appealable; and I agree with that. But how does that, I dont understand <br />exactly then the role of the Director as a party when Rule 14 doesnt, you know, specify that and <br />the Commission as a body is the one empowered to make the decision. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Torigoe, would you like to research that? <br />TORIGOE:No, let me just really briefly address it. I think as in, basically, the Rule <br />14 sets out what the Commissions duties are and what the standards basically are. And under <br />Rule 4, the contested case rules, you know, the Director can come in as a party and present <br />witnesses and cross-examine and everything, if thats what he wants to do. So I think you can <br />harmonize those two and say the Director comes in, Mr. Olson or the party comes in, and they <br />can place whatever evidence on the record, and then the Commission has to apply Rule 14 to that <br />evidence and make a decision. Thats basically it. <br />GALDONES:Okay. Im going to call for a short recess. <br />RECESSEDThe Chair called for a short recess at 11:10 a.m. <br />RECONVENEDThe meeting reconvened at 11:22 a.m. <br />15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.