My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-06-15 Leeward Exh B (Item !&2 Kaupulehu Land LLC)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2023
>
2023-06-15 Leeward
>
Kaupulehu Land LLC (PL-SLU-2022-000008 & PL-REZ-2023-000039)
>
2023-06-15 Leeward Exh B (Item !&2 Kaupulehu Land LLC)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2023 2:52:33 PM
Creation date
8/12/2023 2:51:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
thought process. Taking in community input, taking the input of the Planning Department, and <br /> coming back with this proposal. <br /> So, in this application as the Planning Department presented. The front portion is already Urban <br /> and so for that there's no change on the State Land Use side. For the zoning, we are requesting to <br /> change to Neighborhood Commercial-10,000. The back portion is for an SLU Rural. So, this is a <br /> change from our prior request for Urban and instead of RS-10 in the back which would have made <br /> that back portion more dense. But we're requesting Residential-Ag for .5 and this is the same <br /> slide you saw. The front of the parcel is already Urban, it's that back portion that is labeled with <br /> the "A"that we would be asking, that we are asking you to designate Rural. And if you look a <br /> little bit to the left of that slide you can see that there is a Rural designation up on the right, a few <br /> lots down. So, that Rural designation already exists in Waimea Town, and it really serves to kind <br /> of transition between the Urban and the Ag. <br /> In the Rural district the minimum lot size it can't be less than a half an acre and again, the last time <br /> when we came and we're requesting RS-10. There was sort of this a feeling that there wasn't <br /> enough control on the density that if you had rezoned it RS-10 even though the applicant was <br /> saying he was going to do so many lots. The RS-10 zoning would allow more and so, with the <br /> Rural designation he cannot go smaller than a half an acre. So, it's not going to get more dense <br /> than that. <br /> This again, we wanted to show you what the existing zoning is. So there is Neighborhood <br /> Commercial (CN-10) towards Waimea, on the other side there's RS-10 across the street, Family <br /> Ag. It really does give you sort of the commercial uses on Mamalahoa, off Mamalahoa Highway <br /> and then the residential uses kind of in the back of that and it's a variety and you can see again on <br /> the top left side. So, that area that's Rural in that corner is also Residential Ag -.5. So, that's what <br /> we're kind of looking at, some consistency in town. <br /> This is just a description of the proposed zonings. If you look at the residential and agricultural <br /> half acre it talks about small farms and it is intended to be within the State Land Use Rural or <br /> Urban districts. So, this is showing you the existing surrounding commercial uses. Like you said <br /> the Fish and the Hog is towards Honoka`a, and Earl's and the Minit Stop is across. Towards <br /> Waimea Town you have the HPM Building, you have Napa Auto Parts so those are also not <br /> historical buildings but built with that Waimea sense of community which is what the applicant <br /> intends. <br /> Existing on this property are 2 single-family residences already and the Metzler's fixed them up. <br /> So, we wanted to show this is sort of the character of what the homes that we are anticipating are <br /> going to be on that back portion. So, there's this one and one more and that and to Commissioner <br /> Knowles question about the CDP. So, the way I look at the consistency with the CDP. Because <br /> there's 2 existing residences already, you're really looking at 3 additional residents. So, — <br /> DEFRANCO: Please direct your comments to me. <br /> GARSON: Oh, I'm so sorry. In response to the question about the CDP. So <br /> you're really looking at 3 additional residences. So, that to me isn't keeping in line with the four <br /> 10 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.