My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-06-15 Leeward Exh B (Item !&2 Kaupulehu Land LLC)
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2023
>
2023-06-15 Leeward
>
Kaupulehu Land LLC (PL-SLU-2022-000008 & PL-REZ-2023-000039)
>
2023-06-15 Leeward Exh B (Item !&2 Kaupulehu Land LLC)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2023 2:52:33 PM
Creation date
8/12/2023 2:51:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
additional even though they called them lots. These 2 lots already would have homes on them. <br /> So, you're really looking at 3 additional residences. So, to me it keeps within the spirit of what <br /> the CDP is asking for. The other thing about the 5 lots is Chapter 11 which is the affordable <br /> housing has the affordable housing requirements. If you have 4 lots, there is no affordable <br /> housing requirement. Five it kicks in the 20 percent. So, one of the other thoughts were, okay <br /> well, if he went down to 4 lots, fine, but then actually there is no affordable housing requirement. <br /> By having the 5 there's a 20 percent affordable housing requirement. So, you know we didn't <br /> want to come back and then be accused of trying to skirt having that affordable housing option. <br /> So, again, this is consistent with the General Plan. It's consistent with the already State Land Use <br /> Urban designation and we think that you should give us a favorable recommendation today and <br /> we're all here to answer questions. <br /> DEFRANCO: We appreciate you coming back with the new plan, and I appreciate <br /> seeing the character of the houses that you have presently there because they are in keeping with <br /> the historic look of Waimea and sort of that. I think that some of the concerns then is possibly <br /> what the character that the development would look like in the front. I think one of the testifiers <br /> stated something about the height of that and maybe making it single-story. I just want to address <br /> all this so that we can talk a bit about it. So, in the design. Can you speak to us. You don't really <br /> have any idea of the design of the front, is that right or? <br /> GARSON: One second. It was in the application. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay. <br /> GARSON: So, it should be in your background report and if you're looking at <br /> an electronic version, I'm sorry, so, I'll just have hold it up for you. It's Exhibit 5. <br /> DEFRANCO: Okay. I'm scrolling back to it. Yeah, yeah. <br /> KERN: It's on Page 72 in your PDF's of the Background Report. At least <br /> it's showing 72 on my PDF reader. <br /> [Unintelligible crosstalk] <br /> GARSON: So, if you take a look at that Exhibit, it's that same sort of it has a <br /> historical Waimea Town look to them. <br /> DEFRANCO: Right, okay. So, you know because one of the other testifiers they <br /> wanted to say something about it being a Kmart parking lot, no, KTA parking lot and it gives you <br /> the imagery of this huge shopping center being put there. But that isn't what this is. It is more in <br /> line with maybe medical buildings or something else. Is that what— <br /> GARSON: Correct. I think the types of tenants the applicant was looking for <br /> are doctors, architects, dentists that sort— <br /> 11 <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.