My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-06-08 Salary Commission Minutes (Draft)
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023-06-08 Salary Commission Minutes (Draft)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/17/2023 4:00:22 PM
Creation date
8/17/2023 3:59:36 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
109
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission <br />MS. NAKAMA: Aye. <br />ACTING CHR. LEOPOLDINO: Dr. Kawa`auhau. <br />MS. KAWA`AUHAU: Aye. <br />ACTING CHR. LEOPOLDINO: Ms. Greenbaum. <br />MS. GREENBAUM: Aye. <br />June 8, 2023 <br />ACTING CHR. LEOPOLDINO: We have six ayes, three excused and absent to table Item 613, <br />creation of permitted interaction groups for Salary Commission inquiries to the next meeting. <br />6. C. Drafting Of Letters To Appointing Authorities For Affected Parties For Salary <br />Commission Input <br />MR. LEOPOLDINO: Moving on to item Number 6C on the agenda, "Drafting of Letters to <br />Appointing Authorities for Affected Parties for Salary Commission Input." Any discussion? <br />MR. NELSON: This one this is Nelson. I just had a question. So, we have to do this, is that <br />right? And what is the timing that we have to do it—am I understanding that correctly? <br />MS. FRENZ: This is DCC Cody. So, you are not required to draft a letter but you are required <br />to consult and confer with the appointing authorities by Charter. <br />So, if this Commission were to decide to call or to all show up at the next appointing authority <br />meeting, you could do that. It doesn't seem very expeditious, which is why there is the <br />recommendation for a letter as opposed to how else you would finagle all nine of you to be at the <br />next commission hearing where everyone (inaudible) is present. <br />So, it is not a requirement. But the requirement is, by Charter, conferral with the appointing <br />authorities—that is required. So, we can't get around that one. How you choose to do that is <br />really up to you. <br />And for timing, it really just depends on how quickly this Commission would like to move, right. <br />So, for example, in the police commission hearing there was a discussion by the commission, as <br />a whole, to draft a letter proposing a certain type of raise. And everyone agreed with that. Based <br />on that motion, the chair drafted a template, worked with the secretary for the police <br />commission that letter was then added to the next calendar and then there was continued <br />conversation there about whether or not everyone liked the number, the continued increase, the <br />formatting of it. And then, at that next hearing—at that hearing is when they tweaked the letter, <br />there was a motion to approve the letter and send it to the Salary Commission. <br />Page 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.