My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-07-11 Salary Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023-07-11 Salary Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2023 7:58:41 AM
Creation date
8/17/2023 4:01:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission <br />July 11, 2023 <br />MS. NAMAHOE: Commissioner Namahoe. I have a thought here. First, thank you very much <br />for these examples of letters that were sent out previously. <br />I am reminded of the desk audit thought process, which isin essence, what we're all being <br />tasked to do. We're auditing each none—how do I say this—none bargaining—yes— <br />MALE: <br />argainingyes <br />MALE: And unit. <br />MS. NAMAHOE: —and unit—right. So, I almost wish there was more formal language that <br />would pair with the email or the cover letter, because as much as we'd like to send a generic one, <br />it would be tailored to—"This is, as we understand your current job description, we'd like you to <br />be able to defend yourself against it"—right from the jump. So, if we look at the top letter as an <br />example, which would be the top letter would be from Glynis to this sample, "Aloha, <br />everyone, you have six points: What are the primary duties and responsibilities of the agency <br />head"I would rather have a matrix in front of them to say, "What are the primary duties that <br />you're seeing listed here that you have to go above and beyond to do?" <br />I'd almost like to say, "To give you a chance to succeed for the time that we are requiring of you <br />to apply to this process, I'd like you to say this is your job description. Now, here you go, pen <br />and paper, redo this matrix for us." And I don't know if that's an unrealistic request right from <br />the jump. But my gut instinct is if I were sitting in the department head that's what I'd like to <br />do from Day 1 -to be able to say as the fire chief or police chief, it says that we need to do these <br />many ambulance runs or these many calls. But the reality is, we have these many more fires that <br />take place, so there's even more so the need to do intra -agency support seeking with the Federal <br />and StateI'm going down the rabbit hole trying come up the example but, you know where <br />I'm going. <br />MS. GREENBAUM: Right. Yeah. <br />MS. NAMAHOE: So, is there the question then, is there a desk audit—is there any process <br />that we have in previous paperwork that asks department heads to desk audit or defend against a <br />current job description? Has that ever been done before? Have we ever seen examples of that? <br />FEMALE: No. <br />MS. NAMAHOE: No? <br />FEMALE: Yeah. <br />MS NAMAHOE: Oh, that was quick. <br />MS. FRENZ: This is DCC Cody. The other difference I see, too, is the sample that you have <br />here and what you're talking about, Commissioner Namahoe, is requiring the person—subject to <br />a potential raise or decreaseright, to kind of defend what they think they are deserving. <br />Whereas the Charterso, I go back to the appointing authority for this Commission is the <br />Page 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.