Laserfiche WebLink
Salary Commission <br />July 11, 2023 <br />CharterHawaii County Charter, requires actually the communication to be with the <br />department head or the appointing authority. <br />So, the mayor for the people he appoints, right—those would be everyone on this list 1 through <br />14, for example. He appoints those individuals. And then, all of the people that are appointed by <br />boards or commissions are 15, 16, 17, and 18. So, big difference between asking—let me give a <br />reality—my boss, the Corporation Counsel, to defend what she does and what she thinks she <br />deserves may put that person in an uncomfortable or awkward position versus the mayor who <br />appoints the corporation counsel, right. <br />So, technically, the Charter requires communication and consultation with the appointing <br />authorities—not the actual recipient of a potential raise. Not to say you cannot do that. I just <br />want to point out what the Charter requires by law, right, to make sure we fulfill that <br />requirement. And maybe this Commission consider do you want contacts with the person that <br />would be the recipient of a potential pay increase? <br />It begs the question whether or not those people will feel comfortable to come out and advocate <br />for why I deserve "x." <br />MS. NAMAHOE: Namahoe, again. So, this is what I'm hearing and correct me where I'm <br />wrong. The Charter requires that we reach out to the appointing authority, so we're going to <br />stick with the police commission as the example. The letter then wouldn't go to the police chief, <br />it would go to the police commission. However, the Charter does not preclude us or limit us <br />from reaching out to the police chief as well. <br />MS. FRENZ: Right. <br />MS. NAMAHOE: And if—while it is important to reach out to the commission, I would almost <br />expect—and I could be wrong here but I would almost expect that the one who would know <br />the job description best to be able to defend it, would be the police chief. <br />MS. FRENZ: Correct. <br />MS. NAMAHOE: I have not this discussion has made—solidified the idea ofI still say we <br />send it to the person that may potentially receive the increase because he or she would know that <br />job best. Especially the areas, the gray that suck up time and resources and skillsets in order to <br />do that job and to run that department and meet that budgetary needs. <br />MS. FRENZ: This is DCC Cody. So, I think that's an excellent example of making sure that <br />you're gathering the necessary information the actual work expectations, the work demands, <br />for example that would go into a consideration that this Commission may have on potential pay <br />Increases. <br />I would just ask you all to keep in mind, and not necessarily demand or expect, that the <br />individual potential recipients be required to advocate for themselves. They may not all feel <br />Page 11 <br />