My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-07-11 Salary Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023-07-11 Salary Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2023 7:58:41 AM
Creation date
8/17/2023 4:01:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission <br />July 11, 2023 <br />MS. NAMAHOE: Commissioner Namahoe. I just want to clarify, we're only speaking to <br />clarifying my this question to Commissioner Nelson. Are we just—are you recommending <br />that we only send it to the governing authority the police commission versus the police chief? <br />MR. NELSON: That's my suggestionI mean, we can send it to all people but, ultimately, I <br />think that whoever the appointing authority isI mean, they can go back and they can ask the <br />people—give me the justification why—what you think the salary is. <br />But I think what Cody was saying, some people may not—they may not advocate for themselves <br />or maybe over advocating for themselves. Depends. So, I think it should go to the appointing <br />authorities and they could decide how they want to parse it out. <br />CHR. PAVAO: I have to concur that the appointing authority is who we should be <br />communicating with and asking for information. Asking individual employees to justify their <br />position of their salary would be awkward at best. As a civil servant, if somebody did that to me, <br />I would feel very uncomfortable. <br />MS. GREENBAUM: Commissioner Greenbaum. I agree. <br />MS. NAMAHOE: Commissioner Namahoe. One more time I'm throwing far for this one. I <br />think that I believe that the department heads are going to be solicited by their commissions <br />their respective commissions. They are going to be participating in this whether they're <br />comfortable or not. <br />I believe that they should be afforded the same opportunity because it will help decouple the <br />expectation that they have to do the bulk of their commission's work. And I say this speaking as <br />having sat on the fire commission previously, where I was part of the body that hired the fire <br />chief, at that time. <br />So, I know, what we knew, and what we didn't know. And what we would be looking at this set <br />of lists, the first thing we would do is the following meeting we would be throwing a series of <br />expectations at the fire chief. And then, they would let us know what they and their white shirts, <br />which are their—I don't know how to say white -shirts in English. I can't recall what all of their <br />job duties are, but their leadership then would be in their own scramble, but their audience would <br />then be their bosses. Their fire commission. <br />I bring up my suggestion based on that history where I would like to afford the chiefs their <br />respect to defend/decline per their comfort level versus they're going to be asked, if they are not <br />asked by us they're going to be asked by their managing commission, their managing body. <br />CHR. PAVAO: That's the way it should be. The appointing authority can ask and then they can <br />bring us the information but we should communicate directly to the appointing authority, in <br />my mind. <br />Page 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.