My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-07-11 Salary Commission Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Salary Commission
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023-07-11 Salary Commission Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/8/2023 7:58:41 AM
Creation date
8/17/2023 4:01:51 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
29
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Salary Commission <br />July 11, 2023 <br />MS. NAKAMA: Commissioner Teresa Nakama. I'd like to concur with member Namahoe and <br />ask the bosses of the various department their reason for an increase or decrease. <br />MR. RIORDAN: I think we should stick with the mayor, who is the boss of the first 14 people. <br />And then, we have the commissions—and if we have a—want to have some other discussion <br />about that, then we could talk to the fire chief or the police chief. But it doesn't make any sense <br />to bring in the director of parks and recreation or the director of public works because they're not <br />the boss. The mayor is the boss. And this is Commissioner RiordanI'm sorry. <br />But that's my feeling, is that we send the letter out to the mayor and to these commissions and <br />say, "What do you want us to pay your people? You justify it for us." Because the mayor, also, <br />has to talk to the finance director and find out whether he can afford anything that he is going to <br />recommend. So, that's my suggestion. <br />MS. FRENZ: DCC Cody. Let me throw out a third alternative that may, for your consideration, <br />you could consider doing the email toa third alternative would be to, kind of, blend maybe a <br />hybrid of the two, right—where you send it to the appointing authority per the requirements of <br />the Charter, right, which is what you're tasked with doing. But open the door to the actual <br />appointees, the heads, right the chief of police, for example—should those people also feel <br />compelled to correspondence that they have an opening to do so as well. And either they will or <br />they won't, right. <br />So, maybe that's a happy medium, right? We follow the Charter requirements and ensure that <br />we make that communication. But we also provide the chief of police, the fire chief, the <br />corporation counsel, the mayor himself, the managing director, the department of public works, <br />et cetera, et cetera to also have an opportunity, with that door open, to provide their own input <br />if they want to. Maybe that's a happy medium that covers it and affords the two different <br />mindsets here, right now. No harm, no foul—you get more information then you may want—or <br />maybe you get nothing. I don't know. <br />MS. GREENBAUM: Commissioner Greenbaum. I agree with you, DC Cody. I think the <br />hybrid makes the most sense. It's a soft introduction to the chiefs and they will probably, <br />eventually, be required to provide the information to the head department anyway. But it loops <br />everybody in. <br />MS. NAMAHOE: Commissioner Namahoe. Very happy with that, `cause I think that's actually <br />what I was originally asking. But it sounds better how you just synthesized it. It allows the <br />opportunity for them to jump in or decline, which isit will save them the double work. And <br />thank you very much. Thank you, everyone, for allowing me to (inaudible) on this particular <br />point. <br />MS. GREENBAUM: Thank you for continuing to push for it, `cause it makes sense. <br />MR. RIORDAN: This is Commissioner Riordan. I disagree with it, the hybrid. Because we're <br />asking people to go—subordinate their bosses and say, "My boss isn't correct. I need more <br />Page 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.