Laserfiche WebLink
Salary Commission <br />July 11, 2023 <br />And I think we would defer toI don't know if it would be Glynis, who can help direct us in <br />how to obtain some of the information that we're going to need? <br />MS. FRENZ: This is DCC Cody. So, I think, Commissioner Greenbaum, it really depends on <br />what information this Commission would also like versus what it already has received. So, we <br />can continue to make those requests through secretary through Glynis Yamada. <br />And, preferably, as I was indicating last hearing, it'd be an email. We do have the threads that <br />she sends to you guys with that include myself, Director—Acting Director Patel, Emarie <br />Carvalho, and Glynis—if everybody uses that thread and you hit "reply all" asking for certain <br />information, we can make sure that we don't all do double work trying to obtain that. And then, <br />ultimately, when appropriate, disseminate it to everyone via blind copy emails—right to <br />protect against Sunshine violations. <br />So, we can continue to do that as long as this Commission is actively working and seeking out <br />information to decide what actions, if any, it wants to take. As far as just to circle back to <br />Commissioner Namahoe—for letter drafting purposes, this Commission has received samples. I <br />think, ultimately, getting those letters out in an agreed format that this Commission can agree on, <br />will at least allow Chair Pavao to sign off on an approved letter by this Commission, that can be <br />disseminated to all necessary and relevant appointing authorities or department heads via our <br />secretary and/or Director Patel to, at least, get those out. <br />Because we're going to have to afford those directors or appointing authorities time to meet, if <br />it's a Commission, for example, they meet once a month, hopefully, right—so there will be at <br />least a month—two-month delay before you may get something back depending on meeting <br />schedules, so that this Commission can decide whether or not they want more. <br />I can tell you, for example, at the police commission hearing recently—and we have another <br />meeting next Friday they wanted to potentially come before you and testify as to why they got <br />to where they got—and we had one commissioner who wanted to, in fact, increase the requested <br />amount. <br />So, it may be, and likely would be a work -in -progress for all of the department heads and/or <br />appointing authorities. So starting that request for a position from the relevant people in charge, <br />so to speak, right—appointing authorities or department headsI think is kind of critical to get <br />that conversation going, and then you guys will decide what else you need in light of the request <br />that you may receive. <br />It may be that you don't get any back, right. But a bare minimum you're required to consult and <br />confer. So, that I think you might want to consider as a first step. <br />MS. GREENBAUM: I think that makes sense. This is like a dialogue, right? <br />MS. FRENZ: Yes. <br />Page 6 <br />