My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2023-08-30 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
PublicDocuments
>
Human Resources
>
Merit Appeals Board
>
Minutes
>
2023
>
2023-08-30 Merit Appeals Board Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/4/2023 3:13:47 PM
Creation date
10/4/2023 3:09:57 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Merit Appeals Board August 30, 2023 <br />But, I think, the threshold question for this Board isdo you want to provide input on the <br />salary? And then, if yes yes, you should have the information you need and able to—for you to <br />make a recommendation. If, no, then I mean, it lies squarely with the salary commission. <br />CHR. CABANAS: Right. <br />MR. PATEL: And that's where it (inaudible). <br />MR. KUNZ: MyI have some interest in hearing that the mayor also got this request, made a <br />recommendation—knowing the type of work that has been done with his department heads. And <br />us having a little bit more intimate relationship with the HR side, than the mayor probably—we <br />would have an idea. <br />But I would be interested to see what the mayor thinks his department heads increase is worth <br />and valued. And that's why I asked if there was some, sort of, guideline. I know we can <br />arbitrarily provide a number, which I agree with the Chair, makes it very—it's hard for me to <br />validate an increase not knowing some other information that's not provided to us. And one of <br />that pieces of information would be my curiosity being satisfied with what the mayor had <br />suggested as an overall number for his department heads. I'd be interested to know what that is. <br />MR. PATEL: So, I can say that the mayor's response to the salary commission was no <br />recommendation. He left it squarely to the salary commission. Hence, department heads then <br />being able to send in, separately, what they wanted. <br />MS. DE SOTO: So, seeing that we're a fairly thorough Board and I don't think we like to make <br />premature decisionsI did notice that the letter was requesting a response by August 2nd as they <br />were supposed to meet on it on this topic on August 4h. <br />Do you have any information about how our feedback would be received or utilized at this point? <br />MR. PATEL: That was the response mainly for departments. For the appointing authorities that <br />were boardsI think it's accounted for at the ending of that letter saying we would provide more <br />time. <br />Realistically speaking, the process that the salary commission goes through when coming up <br />initially with a proposal, at best—an absolute, 100 percent efficiency—will be three to four <br />months. So, there's time. <br />CHR. CABANAS : I noticed in the 2019 letter to the to chair back then there's really no <br />number that they came up with in terms of recommended salary for the director. The thing with <br />the salary comparisons is that, from an organizational standpoint, it's not only what the directors <br />are doing, but it's the scope of the work. <br />So, even across the various counties in the State—the salaries are different, right, for the director <br />of human resources, right. <br />Page 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.