My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-09-04 TMAEDAsatoru
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-09-04 TMAEDAsatoru
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:10:47 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:10:44 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IWASHITA: It’s her motion, not mine. <br />WOODWARD: But I’m asking you whether that would allay your concerns. <br />IWASHITA: Oh, he said what I said so -. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. <br />IWASHITA: But it’s Commissioner Ogata’s motion. <br />WOODWARD: All right. Do you want to leave the motion as it stands or would <br />you like to modify it to say that it will need a certified kitchen but it will only be used by <br />Mr. Maeda, which would allow him to bring other products but he would have to be in <br />charge of the process? <br />OGATA: I’m fine with my motion. But if somebody wants to propose an <br />amendment, that’s fine. <br />WOODWARD: Okay. Well, no, it’s your motion. So we’ve had a motion and a <br />second. We have any discussion? <br />BOWMAN: I would like to propose an amendment that we say that it will only <br />be operated by Mr. Maeda, the applicant. <br />WOODWARD: Okay, do we have a second to the amendment? <br />IWASHITA: Second. <br />WOODWARD: Okay, any discussion on the amendment? <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? <br />WOODWARD: Yes, sir. <br />DOMINGO: I have something to say. I speak against the amendment. I know <br />given the choice to Mr. Maeda with regards to actually having his go through and just put <br />aside this amendment he would rather have it that way. But I’m looking at a perspective, <br />perhaps a long-term perspective, and the use of that agricultural land. It gives him a <br />flexibility for the use of that land. It gives him an opportunity to add to his sources, of <br />his income source, which he may need because it’s everything in agriculture and it’s <br />unpredictable. And so it gives him that flexibility to decide what he can do in the future, <br />you know. And then for that reason I speak against the motion and for not putting any <br />restrictions to it. <br /> EXHIBIT A <br />21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.