My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-09-07 TSHEPARD
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-09-07 TSHEPARD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:18:31 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:18:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IWASHITA: Three and two, is that what you said? <br />GRAHAM: Yes. <br />IWASHITA: Yes. <br />GRAHAM: All right, thank you. Can we go with the vote, or do you have <br />something else you’d like to say? <br />IWASHITA: Well, you know, my concern is that there are some assumptions <br />being made here or, you know, expectations. I don’t know what you want to call them, <br />right, in terms of what the applicant is going to be able to do. And frankly from my side, <br />you know, you’re talking about a zoning change and a buildout for light industrial. You <br />know, they can have this storage facility and loading dock, that kind of stuff. I don’t see <br />that there’s a guarantee, you know, that that’s going to happen. And the reason I favor a <br />longer period of time is because the reality is on the ground in terms of what the applicant <br />may be able to get other than this rezoning, right, which to me if you’re going to say that <br />we want to support our zoning laws and the Zoning Code and how it’s implemented then <br />we should be really looking at what’s already there. Because every time we do another <br />rezoning, right, we actually are dishing what we already have, we are. Every time we <br />say, okay, we’ll change the zone, right, well developers expect that to happen then. And <br />then our existing Zoning Code which I agree with Commissioner Domingo, we should be <br />implementing that. The effective way to implement that is to say what we have is what <br />we have and is what we should develop.It’s not to say, well, it’s where we have <br />commercial/industrial being developed now is not being developed so we’re going to <br />allow more because somebody bought a piece of land and now they want to do that. So <br />you know, that’s fine if the applicants want three years and is agreeable to three years, I’ll <br />change the motion. Just make it three years, with a one year extension, that’s fine, I’ll do <br />that. But as far as I’m concerned, you know, that’s based on some expectations that <br />might not pan out. But -. <br />GRAHAM: Okay, well, we do have a motion before us. Maybe we can, we <br />have three years of a two-year extension and I’d like to go ahead and try to bring this to <br />an end. <br />IWASHITA: Right now it’s three years and two. <br />GRAHAM: That’s what I said, three years with a two-year extension is what <br />we have before us. <br />IWASHITA: Okay, well, I’m willing to do it, three years and one if that helps <br />any of the other Commissioners, that it’s a shorter period of time. <br />GRAHAM: I think Mr. Torigoe told us we could go ahead and vote; and if we <br />don’t get the vote we can change. Commissioner Woodward, would you -? <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />21 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.