My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007-09-07 TSHEPARD
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2007
>
2007-09-07 TSHEPARD
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:18:31 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:18:28 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
IWASHITA: Well, if Commissioner Woodward is agreeable to the amendment <br />then -. <br />WOODWARD: I actually would prefer we just vote on what we have and then if <br />that doesn’t pass -. <br />IWASHITA: Okay, fine. <br />WOODWARD: And then we’ll renew it. <br />IWASHITA: Thank you. <br />DOMINGO: Mr. Chairman? Mr. Chairman? <br />GRAHAM: Commissioner Domingo, do we need to keep going? <br />DOMINGO: Yeah. For further discussion, I’d just like to make it clear that they <br />have zoning over there and it’s agriculture zoning, and that she has utilized that zoning, <br />that land to a great advantage and to her credit because she has been successful. But <br />what’s happening now is that she has come here and she’s asking for dispensation in <br />regards to the use of the property and she wants to use a part of the property for a storage <br />facility. Okay? Now what I was saying is that in my opinion that’s contrary to what’s <br />being zoned there. And the question of we have a zoning there, let’s use it and utilize it <br />and go on with it -. But she’s asking for a different use of the property. And that’s what <br />I’m concerned about. And that’s what the Planning Director is concerned about, if you <br />would reflect upon his recommendation. And, you know, I take it very seriously with <br />what we’re doing. It’s a very important thing because it will reflect on our future <br />deliberations and actions that we take.Now as Commissioner Iwashita has suggested, <br />he’s willing to go to three and one. I can go with that. That’s a compromise position. <br />And my original position was two years; but other than that, I just will vote no for this <br />measure. <br />WOODWARD: Then I would be willing to accept the amended motion from <br />Commissioner Iwashita, three and one. <br />IWASHITA: Yes. <br />GRAHAM: Okay. So we do have an amended motion for the vote then, which <br />is a permit granted for three years with a one year extension, administratively, at the <br />discretion of the Planning Director possible. Okay, Jeff, can we take a vote on that. <br />DARROW: Okay. If you can give me a little time here, I’m going to just go <br />through these conditions briefly. <br /> EXHIBIT B <br />22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.