My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-09-11 tsoto911
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-09-11 tsoto911
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:20:16 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:20:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I plan to wrap up here. I was handed a sketch of the proposed development on my way <br />in. Someone asked me to please draw your attention to the fact that Unit 1, the way itÓs <br />drawn is within 28 feet of the property line. No one has actually done the shoreline <br />investigation in this location and thereÓs no real-drawn high water mark or shoreline <br />setback line drawn here. So weÓre curious as to whether Mr. Soto knows exactly that 28 <br />feet 11 inches is the setback required in that location. WeÓve been asking, Sea Village <br />has been asking for a larger setback to please try to alleviate some of the views from the <br />neighbors here. <br />Well, mahalo. On behalf of myself and my neighbors, the 30-or-so letters that you have, <br />I, again, thank you. YouÓve heard Ms. Nagai talk about the ancient Hawaiian burial site <br />on the parcel. YouÓve heard Mr. Haney discuss inadequate easements, failure to meet <br />traffic and safety concerns of the DPW and the KTSC. Easements are mis-represented in <br />the application as it stands now. YouÓve heard me discuss the potential lack of a sewage <br />easement and youÓve also heard us recall the memories of witness <br />happened to that tree, and now youÓve been asked to sign off on archeological and <br />botanical surveys. <br />Well, along with the letters from my neighbors and the facts that we have submitted to <br />you today both verbally and in paper form, we feel that you have heard enough to reject <br />this application; and we hope that you will do so. Mahalo. <br />FUJIKAWA:Thank you. Commissioners, any question to this testifier? Go <br />ahead, Commissioner Graham. <br />GRAHAM:I wanted to ask Mr. Hayashi regarding what you folks said. Two <br />of you I know spoke of trucked-in sand and what could become of the sand, and I wasnÓt <br />aware of this from what I read. And it would seem that -. <br />FUJIKAWA:Yeah, I -. <br />GRAHAM:Excuse me? <br />FUJIKAWA:Go ahead. <br />GRAHAM:It would seem that if the sand was to be put in along the shoreline, <br />there would need to be a shoreline setback variance and things like that involved for this. <br />IÓm just wondering if thatÓs accurately depicting what is being proposed, Norman, or -. <br />HAYASHI:Yeah, I donÓt recall seeing anything in the petition that would <br />reflect the creation of a sandy beach. I may be wrong, I may have missed that. But I just <br />conferred with Phyllis, also, that, you know, and we concur that we didnÓt see anything in <br />the petition that states that there would be sand imported on the property to create a <br />beach. <br />13 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.