Laserfiche WebLink
on Hinalani Street. I noted also that access to the Kohanaiki and Energy Lab properties <br />that was indicated that would be directly across from the ApplicantÓs project wouldnÓt <br />really relieve any traffic on Queen Kaahumanu Highway. The traffic between those <br />projects would probably be relatively minimal; and in any event because of limited <br />access to Queen Kaahumanu Highway, itÓll all wind up there eventually. <br />There are three things that have come to light following the testimony that we offered last <br />month. First was the indication from Mr. Fuke that the plans are conceptual. In other <br />words, they can be changed. The second was an article in West H <br />appeared during the month that the property is for the sale. And the third is that, in <br />todayÓs paper, regarding the Kohanaiki project, which will probably lead to even more <br />traffic which was not contemplated at all by the Applicant. Those things all taken <br />together could lead to greater effect on traffic then was contemplated. Because if the <br />zoning application for the Applicant is granted and the SMA is granted, the developer <br />could erect, for example, a big box of store instead of the smaller shops that are <br />contemplated. And a big box store, we donÓt need another one, would lead obviously to <br />much more traffic than would be generated by a number of small retail shops. We donÓt <br />want another LoweÓs-type situation to occur. <br />So we would urge that this Commission go slowly. IÓm originally from Chicago and we <br />had a saying there that ÐGovernment is best when it moves slowly and nobody is safe <br />when the Legislature is in session.Ñ So I take special note, also, that -. <br />YUEN:We have a good government. <br />GIMPEL:I know; and, parenthetically, I hope to be a part of it soon. <br />We would take special note that even a four-lane highway, Queen Kaahumanu Highway, <br />is contemplated eventually between Henry Street and the airport; but the first phase <br />would ostensibly go to the harbor, wonÓt relieve traffic. In fact, itÓs going to add to traffic <br />congestion at the north and south ends because then you will have two lanes that are <br />going south trying to merge into one lane. And thatÓs going to really, itÓs like a funnel, <br />when you pour into the wide end, itÓs very fast but it comes slowly out the narrow end. <br />So we, again, urge going very slowly and waiting for the Department of TransportationÓs <br />determination before, so that the Planning Department can make a recommendation that <br />takes into account all these concerns for the Planning CommissionÓs consideration. <br />Thank you. <br />FUJIKAWA:Thank you very much. Commissioners, any questions to <br />this testifier? If not, you may proceed, Burke. <br />BURKE MATSUYAMA:Thank you, Chairman. Our park is located approximately a <br />thousand feet, I believe, from the ApplicantÓs property. Our organization is comprised of <br />about 40 landowners whose business is ranged from truckers, bus companies, equipment <br />rentals; and we have a planned commercial center on the front that would have a service <br />11 <br /> <br />