My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2003-09-11 TCLIFT
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003
>
2003-09-11 TCLIFT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:20:23 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:20:20 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
you wish to exceed whatever has been represented here, then you would have to go in for <br />the amendment. <br />SPRINGER:So in the event that a, after additional development an <br />increase in the number of units was desired, would that be an administrative process with <br />the Planning Director? <br />FUKE:No, it would have to be through the same process that <br />weÓre going through right now, public hearing through the Planning Commission for the <br />SMA; and depending on what the County Council ultimately conditions as a, for the <br />Project District zoning before the County Council. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />FUJIKAWA:Are there any other questions from the Commissioners? <br />Go ahead, Commissioner Graham. <br />GRAHAM:Sidney, this is not so much a question as more a heads-up <br />for, you know, what is my concerns that will probably come forth if we have a continued <br />hearing. When the Planning Director was speaking of the transportation issue, we have a <br />Department of Transportation thatÓs taken into account the different parcels in this area <br />and how to coordinate them. When weÓre talking about water quality and ocean <br />resources, we donÓt have any department of that, that sort of looking at all the different <br />possible projects and what effect they might all cumulatively have. And I noticed when I <br />read your Appendices A, B and C regarding water quality, marine resources and all, it all <br />seems, you know, just whatÓs coming from your project. So it ma <br />upon you to put together the full plan for whatÓs going on but itÓs certainly incumbent <br />upon me and us to consider the cumulative effect of all whatÓs going on. So I donÓt feel <br />itÓs appropriate that we act in sort of a first-come, first-serve basis. Meaning that a <br />certain amount of nutrient loading maybe wouldnÓt cause much problems, and if youÓre <br />the first one to get here and get a permit for it, then you get to use it. That doesnÓt really <br />feel right to me. So I have a concern about the overall planning as far as whatÓs going to <br />be the impact on the ocean and the water resources. <br />FUJIKAWA:Are there any questions or comments from the <br />Commissioners to this Applicant? I have a question with the Director. Being that the <br />Applicant had just stated that this is a land exchange with the State, is the State aware of <br />that so they could assist these people in speeding up the process on the traffic control <br />situation? <br />YUEN:I donÓt know if the land exchange has any, I donÓt know if <br />the Department of Transportation cares if the property was exchanged at, when, a dozen <br />years or so ago, I think, with the State. <br />FUJIKAWA:Maybe the County should inform the State that being that <br />this was a land exchange that maybe they could look into it faster. Any other questions to <br />9 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.