My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-09-16 TCONTINENTAL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-09-16 TCONTINENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:23:12 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:23:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Belt Highway. So you have vehicular access down both of those roads to the public parking <br />areas, and then you have to walk from the parking areas. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. May I continue? <br />GALDONES:Yes,you may. <br />SPRINGER:There was some discussion by the testifier on, I guess, the difference <br />between public as compared to the Pepeekeo Community Association access. Can you clarify <br />that for me or us? <br />YUEN:Yeah, Pepeekeo Community Association negotiated a preferential access <br />for their community members on a private basis. And the maindifferences that I can recall on <br />the Pepeekeo access are that on a couple of places where, on the public access you have to park <br />andwalkroughlyathousandfeettotheocean.Thecommunityaccess,memberswillbeableto <br />drive through there and park much closer to the ocean. And I think they have one additional <br />access point thats a little bit on the Hilo side of the Pepeekeo Mill where they can drive and park <br />thats not, thats not a public access at all. You can still get to that point on a public access, but <br />you have to take another walking access and then walk to that point. <br />SPRINGER:And my last question, there were several references to a variety of <br />reservations in favor of particular parcels of property that were early on in the testifiers <br />comments. <br />YUEN:Im not sure what shes referring to. I think the subdivision map <br />successfully gave access to all of their own lots. The question of the access to the Coast Guard <br />lot, it looks like the Coast Guard lot has an easement. If you look at the map there you see the <br />Coast Guard lot thats on the coast, theres an easement to whats called Beach Road in the <br />subdivision plans. I dont know what the Coast Guards access is, rights are, on Beach Road or <br />after Beach Road. However, from the standpoint of our doing the subdivision, we, I didnt see, <br />we dont have anything that shows what their access was before we did the subdivision, either. <br />ROHR:Now you do. <br />YUEN:So, from that standpoint, its an interesting question; but I dont think the <br />subdivision itself landlocked the Coast Guard. If it was landlocked, it may have been landlocked <br />before that, or there may have been some kind of informal arrangement, or perhaps there is a <br />formal easement over Beach Road, and that I dont know, on behalf of the United States <br />government. But, as I mentioned, the subdivision itself didnt create any new access difficulties <br />to the Coast Guard lot. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Siracusa? <br />23 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.