My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-09-16 TCONTINENTAL
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-09-16 TCONTINENTAL
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:23:12 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:23:05 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
The legal requirements of HCC 34 are not discretionary and have not been met by the Planning <br />Department andContinental Pacific, LLC. The only fair way to mitigate the harm caused to the <br />community and members of the public and to assure therewill be no manifest injustice affecting <br />the substantial rights of members of the public in this proceeding would be suspend this <br />proceeding, and review of any subdivision applications or any relatedapplications for all parcels <br />created by Subdivision 7644 until which time the requirements of Chapter 34 are met and any <br />breach of the April 12, 2002 Settlement Agreement is cured. <br />Thank you for your time. <br />GALDONES:Thank you, Ms. Rohr. Commissioners? Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:I have some questions of the Planning Director regarding the testifiers <br />comments. I guess, first of all, cause thats the closest to the front of my memory, on the <br />recommended suspension of these proceedings, do you have a comment on that with regard to <br />the Chapter 34 and the settlement agreement? <br />YUEN:Weve negotiated a public access, public access is open. I mean, in fact, <br />people go down and use it, theyre not being blocked from using it. The settlement agreement <br />did say that the official opening of public access, and by that I mean when we would have signs <br />anditreallyisofficiallyCountyresponsibility,wouldtakeplaceupontheadoptionofusage <br />rules. That part is my fault. I havent finished the usage rules. We have circulated a set of usage <br />rules to public agencies. We havent put them out for public comment and rule-making yet. I <br />expect to do that really soon. These are rules that say things like No setting fires, No <br />littering, etc. Without those rules in place, the authority of the County on these public accesses <br />is a little bit uncertain as to how people are supposed to behave themselves. So, at the moment, <br />it is a matter of good grace by the landowner that the public access is physically open. We hope <br />to get this squared away pretty soon and finalize the rules so that then when the County officially <br />takes it over, then there are rules in place to govern how people act. <br />We have processed the subdivision approvals, though. Theyve laid out the subdivision. <br />Theyve laid out the public access on the ground so that it is, if there is any difficulty we do <br />have, there isnt any difficulty with their being a public access and it being legally assured. <br />ROHR:I disagree. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. Furthermore, on the matter of the public road and the <br />references to the Hawaii Belt Highway as compared to the Mill Road to satisfy conditions of <br />public access, can you comment on that? <br />YUEN:Yes. Both the settlement agreement and the subdivision documents, Mill <br />Road and Railroad are, theres public right to drive those for use of the public access from the <br />22 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.