My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-09-16 TCONTINENTALSMA 03-016
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-09-16 TCONTINENTALSMA 03-016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:24:54 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:24:51 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
GALDONES:Okay. Any further discussion? Before we proceed, I havea request from <br />the commissioners to take a short break, so Miss Rohr, would you indulge us? Im going to call <br />for a five-minutes recess. <br />RECESSEDThe Chair called a short recess at 12:30 p.m. <br />RECONVENEDThe meeting reconvened at 12:40 p.m. <br />GALDONES:The Hawai`i County Planning Commission is back in order. <br />Miss Rohr, you are still under oath. Miss Rohr, we would appreciate it if youd be able to help us <br />to expedite this along, so if you could make your presentation as expeditiously as possible. Im <br />not trying to rush you. However, but if you could help us, we would appreciate that. You may <br />proceed. <br />ROHR:This is complicated. The negotiated, I mean the settlement agreement <br />does not allow the Planning Director to make any changes within his office. So what gets done <br />here is it. <br />I dont think that the shoreline access in this project is to the law. If you read Chapter 34, there <br />are distances for shoreline access. I think were missing one. Im asking that you make as a <br />condition, this application, an additional shoreline access at this point down by the power plant, <br />because the distance is too far. The law provides for shoreline access in the case of RS zoning <br />every 800 to 1,000 feet; in the case of Ag land, its, maybe the Corporation Counsel could tell us <br />thedistance.ItsChapter34requirements. <br />LIM:Chairman,IguessImightmakeacommentthatmighthelpsomeofthe <br />resolution of this issue. Chapter 34 was enacted in response to a state law that required the <br />counties to implement public access in any subdivision applications. Chapter 34 still has to have <br />the Planning Directors rules to actually get, to implement them. And so what weve been doing <br />with the Planning Director on this and on other projects is to try to see what the best workable <br />access was that was as close as possible to the requirements of Chapter 34. <br />And Chapter 34 only requires pedestrian access mauka/makai at certain designated intervals. <br />And as you see from the provisions that weve given here, the public is allowed to drive down <br />pretty much all the way close to the water from the main highway. So if you were to follow the <br />strict requirements of Chapter 34, all you would have is, you know, every 1,000 to 1,500 feet <br />10-foot-wide mauka/makai public access alignments where theyve got to walk 3 or 4 miles <br />down towards the ocean. Thats all that Chapter 34 requires. <br />So I think that the public access plan that weve developed with driving down to pretty much <br />near the water, parking lots, and then further walking down more than adequately meets the <br />requirements of Chapter 34. <br />YUEN:Let me just follow up on that. The public access here meets both the spirit <br />and the letter of Chapter 34. In an agricultural area, which is what were dealing with here, the <br />location of the accesses is supposed to be 1,500 to 2,500 feet apart; and it does not actually call <br />for a continuous lateral access. It calls for an access to the shore. So what we have is we have <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.