Laserfiche WebLink
access points that are -- if you look at the proposed subdivision map, we have, on this end -- for <br />these 11 lots on the south end, we have two access points where youcanwalk to the shore, and <br />then you have a continual lateral access along the shore. <br />The widest gap between those, the gap between the two points is 873 feet. The one parking, one <br />access point is 686 feet from the north end of the proposed subdivided lots, andthen it‰s another <br />800 feet to the boundary of the next lot. <br />So there‰s about, from that access point, there‰s about 1,500 feet to the next point, to the power <br />plant. Now when you hit the power plant lot, thepublic access stops. The power plant is owned <br />by somebody else. It is under an SMA permit, but there‰s no public access requirement for that <br />permit. <br />So you don‰t have, even not counting the fact that you have a lateral public access, the spacing <br />complieswithChapter34. <br />GALDONES:MissRohr? <br />ROHR:Okay.I‰msorry,butIdisagree.TherequirementsofSMA221requires <br />that, what used to be lot 53, the Hilo Coast Power Company grant public access to the shoreline <br />as a requirement. I also disagree. I think that there‰s, if you take the shore -. I‰m not sure how <br />you‰re supposed to measure, whether it‰s by the straight line as the crow flies or take into account <br />the inundations of the shoreline, but I believe it‰s more than 2,500 feet to the, from this access to <br />the one at Mill Road. <br />I think the one at Mill Road was also the one that the power plant is using for SMA 221, so <br />you‰re sort of using it twice. So I disagree with that. And I think the way to tell is for the <br />Planning Director to provide you all with the requirements of SMA 221. I brought this up before <br />that those should have been respected within this other SMA permit. <br />Okay. So during the break we‰ve determined that the main road system on this Subdivision Map <br />7644 is misidentified as Parcel 93 and does not coordinate with this chart on the right which <br />outlines the various easements. <br />I would like to suggest in this next SMA that the Planning Commission, since the Director can‰t <br />do this in his own capacity because of the settlement agreement, that you ask that Easement R-1 <br />through R-8 be also designated a public easement for vehicular traffic in favor of the County of <br />Hawai`i and public access. <br />This is a requirement of Chapter 34, to provide a continuous access from a public road. <br />Nowhere is there, in every other subdivision document, I think these things need to be corrected; <br />that these file plans are legal documents. It‰s all we have to go by. That‰s all the title companies <br />have to go by. I would appreciate it if I could go home and sleep tonight knowing that you‰re <br />going to preserve for the future public access all the way to a public road. <br />In other words, the public access that is listed on this subdivision plan remains landlocked. They <br />start here. Maybe there‰s public access to this point, but there is no provision for the public to <br />legally drive down Mill Road, go along the railroad and access the parking lot. <br />4 <br /> <br />