My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-09-16 TMORTARA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-09-16 TMORTARA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:25:12 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:24:57 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SIRACUSA:And I would think at that point thatthey would also have to <br />remove that signage. Because, otherwise, it would be confusing if there was a sign there <br />and no legal access. <br />YUEN:Well, their property goes to the corner so they could put a sign up <br />on the corner. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yeh? We kind of butchered up your decision. <br />YEH:I beg your pardon? You butchered -. Im not hurt at all, believe <br />me. Thats just a natural outcome of the discussion youre having. Its great. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yeh, having heard the discussion and the amendments to it, <br />Im just calling you back if there were any further comments on your part before I close <br />thediscussionandgoforaction. <br />YEH:Youknow,theonlythingaboutsignageis,youknow,theCounty <br />does have a sign ordinance that allows signs of certain sizes for certain businesses. And <br />the only comment I would make is maybe just to indicate that, you know, during the Plan <br />Approval process, the sign location and function shall be approved during that process, as <br />opposed to talking about minimum. Because that can be, could lead to some issues about <br />interpretation. So, that would be my only comment. <br />GALDONES:Jeff, could we add that on just for clarity? <br />DARROW:That the Applicant conform to the Sign Code? Im sorry, I missed <br />that. I was writing down the sentence -. <br />YEH:Well, essentially, that the location and function of the sign shall be <br />part of the Plan Approval process. <br />DARROW:Okay. <br />YEH:And maybe Chris has some language about that. <br />YUEN:The reason I talked about minimal functional sign is that I <br />appreciate that youre allowing a business and they need to be able to identify themselves <br />from the highway. Im not sure what the Sign Code does for a Special Permit, first point. <br />Second point, if the Sign Code then says that a Special Permit follows a commercial sign, <br />thats, I dont know, I would not agree with that for a Special Permit in a location like <br />this where you could have the kind of sign that you could put on a commercial building. <br />I think that would be too big a sign. <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yeh? <br />15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.