My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-09-16 TMORTARA
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-09-16 TMORTARA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:25:12 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:24:57 AM
Metadata
该页面上没有批注。
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YEH:I think maybe just to say the location and size of the signs to be <br />approved during Plan Approval process, and then the Applicant and the Planning <br />Department can kind of negotiate what that should be. That might be the most <br />appropriate. And the final say will be with the Planning Department, anyway, so -. <br />GALDONES:Would that be acceptable, Mr. Yuen? <br />YUEN:Id still prefer my wording cause it gives some direction to where <br />were going with this. I mean, in either case, either wording leaves it as a judgment call <br />to the Department when the sign comesin; but I think that the first wording gives a <br />clearer indication of where were going with this. Do we have the Sign Code handy? <br />TORIGOE:Its in the County Code. <br />YUEN:Yes. <br />TORIGOE:Itsnoteasytodecipher. <br />YUEN:Youretryingtoworkonit? <br />TORIGOE:Illjustkindoflookatit. <br />GALDONES:In the meantime, Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Yeah. My question, I guess, to the Planning Director is just that, I <br />mean, what, since it sounds like this isgoing to go back to discussions in the Planning <br />Department, what is, whats your idea on proper sign -? I mean, since I dontknow what <br />the Code is, I mean, are we talking, you know, 4 ft. by 8 ft., or 1 ft. by 2 ft., or, you <br />know? <br />YUEN:Well, were not talking 4 ft. by 8 ft. and probably bigger than <br />1 ft. by 2 ft. Its somewhere in between, yeah. I mean, the other thing in my view is that <br />the sign should be directed at the Hilo, you know, in the Hilo direction because from the <br />Site Plan and my expectation from what the Department of Transportation is going to <br />permit is a right-in only that youre not -. You know what, does our condition say that, <br />that theyre limited to a right-in? Because, you know, and the only way to control this at <br />this location is by the direction of the driveway. But I think we should say that the <br />ingress is a right-in only. Otherwise, you have people stopping and turning left off the <br />highway. Were not going to make them do a left-turn pocket, but I dont think they <br />should do a left-turn. And people are just going to have to, people coming from the <br />Volcano direction are going to have to pre-orient themselves and know that this is where <br />theyre going; and if they pass it, theyre going to have to find, make a u-turn. But if you <br />have a sign from, that is trying to attract highway travel coming from the Volcano <br />direction, youre almost inviting people to make a u-turn at the site off the main highway. <br />16 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.