My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-09-16 TSPECTRASITE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-09-16 TSPECTRASITE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:25:10 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:25:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
DARROW:Thank you, Mr. Chairman. As mentioned, we had received the <br />letter from the Petitioners in the contested case informing us that they will not be able to <br />make the hearing. As discussed earlier on the previous application, this would be a good <br />opportunity to be able to minimize costs and be able to have the Commission hear this <br />particular contested case hearing and be able to take care of the issues in-house. <br />GALDONES:Commissioners, what you will be acting upon today is the request <br />that we hear this, put this on the agenda at the next Hilo meeting and the Planning <br />Commission become the hearing officer for this because theres not going to be a hearing <br />officer. So thats the action that you will be acting upon. Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Just to be clear, the contested case hearing still needs to proceed, <br />cause they have not withdrawn their contested case. Theyre just saying that theyre not <br />going to participate in it. Is that correct? <br />GALDONES:That is correct. <br />MCCALL:Okay. Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Further discussion? Commissioner Siracusa? <br />SIRACUSA:Well, Im trying to understand how it can go on if theyre not <br />participating. Because a contested case involves some give-and-take, you know, cross- <br />examination of witnesses, isnt that correct? <br />GALDONES:Mr. Yuen. <br />SIRACUSA:Then its only one-sided and its not a contested case. <br />YUEN:Well, we tend to use the word, the term contested case only <br />when theres an Intervenor; but, actually, to be technical about it, all of these permit <br />applications are contested cases. Its just that without an Intervenor, we do it informally; <br />and the only parties are the, the County is actually a party, the Planning Director is a <br />party, and the Applicant then is a party. And so the County, the Applicant has witnesses, <br />the County has witnesses and exhibits, people from the public can come up and testify. <br />The County, the Commissioners and the Applicant can cross-examine. The Applicant, <br />for example, has a right to question our staff or myself about things that we may say. So <br />thats cross-examination. And then when you come out with your decision, if its adverse <br />to the Applicant, the Applicant actually has the right to appeal that to court because this is <br />a contested case. If it wasnt, they wouldnt have a right to appeal. And if the <br />Department was opposed to the permit and the Commission granted it, then the <br />Department would have the right to appeal to court. <br />So, in this case, you have a party that has requested intervention; and, so, normally, then <br />we go into this more formal mode. We could actually, and weve talked about this, have <br />the contested case hearing, formal contested case hearing, right there at the same day and <br />2 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.