My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2004-09-16 TSPECTRASITE
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2004
>
2004-09-16 TSPECTRASITE
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:25:10 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:25:03 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
say, you know, put on your witnesses and lets go do it. But, normally, weve been either <br />postponing that for a later time for the hearing or sending it off to a hearings officer. <br />Now, if what happens, returning to this particular application, if what happens is we <br />schedule it for the Commission to hear it and the Intervenor does not show up, then itll <br />be two-sided in the sense that youll have the Applicant and youll have the Department, <br />the same as what happened a few minutes ago. There wont be a report, the Department <br />will have a recommendation and the Commission can just take a vote on it. <br />GALDONES:Commissioner Springer? <br />SPRINGER:In the previous action and this action before us now, even though <br />theyre not present at the meeting or the hearing, do the Intervenors still have the right to <br />appeal by which virtue of having filed for its, that status? <br />YUEN:I believe they do. But they would have a tough time because they <br />wouldhavetoshowthecourtthatwhatthey,thattheypresentedsomeobjectionherethat <br />was not dealt with by the Commission. So if they went to court and they said, Gee, <br />theres going to be toxic fumes coming out of this glass-blowing operation and the <br />Commission didnt look at it, the court is not going to look at their evidence that they <br />have, that they didnt come in here, for example. So I believe they still, once they file for <br />the contested case, they file something in opposition, theyve been granted standing, they <br />can appeal an adverse judgment. But theyre, and theyre not going to get immediately <br />thrown out of court but they will have a really tough time on their appeal. <br />SPRINGER:Thank you. <br />GALDONES:Further questions? Commissioner McCall? <br />MCCALL:Just a further clarification I get, like when Tom Yeh was the <br />hearings officer on the previous application, I mean, he made a point of even though the <br />Intervenors were not there, he made a point of looking at their information, bringing up <br />the questions that they had questioned. I mean, we can, and as Commissioners, we can <br />and should do that as we would with anybody else. Someone coming in to testify, we can <br />bring in their comments and trying, you know, elucidate the responses and stuff, so -. <br />GALDONES:Yes. Hearing no further comments, is the Applicant or the <br />representative present here today? No? Is there anyone from the public, Sharon, signed <br />up to testify on this matter? <br />NOMURA:No one. <br />GALDONES:Did someone want to testify that did not sign up? Hearing none, <br />Commissioners, you have heard the motion that is before us, the request by the Planning <br />Director. Do I -. I will entertain a motion at this time. Commissioner Springer? <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.