My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008-09-19 TGREENWELLFARMS
PublicDocuments
>
Planning Department
>
Leeward/Windward Planning Commission
>
Minutes & Exhibits Transcripts
>
2003-2022 Exhibits Transcripts
>
2008
>
2008-09-19 TGREENWELLFARMS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2011 10:29:04 AM
Creation date
6/14/2011 10:29:02 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
the main access at the highway. And I don’t know that the applicant or the Planning Department <br />would limit them to using one farm road or the other. <br />HOUSEL: I see. Okay, thank you. <br />WATANABE: Any further -? Mr. Domingo. <br />DOMINGO: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. I see that there’s an agreement in September <br />2007. Do they have employees currently housed in the buildings? Or do we have to wait until <br />the applicant or the representative comes up? <br />COTTLE: I think the applicant would be better able to answer that. From talking to <br />them I believe they were this season starting to house the workers; so they haven’t actually had <br />workers in those three structures yet. <br />WATANABE: Mr. Woodward. <br />WOODWARD: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The question I have, if they are planning on <br />trying to expand their special permit so that they can work on other farms, is all of the coffee that <br />is going to be harvested on those other farms going to be processed here, or are we creating a <br />labor camp? <br />COTTLE: Again, you may want to directly ask the applicant that, but I believe they <br />are processing the coffee from those other farms on this lot. <br />WOODWARD: All right. Well, I think strongly that that ought to be added as a condition <br />if, you know, rather than to create a labor camp where they can farm out, essentially, labor to <br />other growers. I think that would be a really bad precedent. Now, if they are planning on just <br />sending their workers out to harvest coffee that they are going to process, I have no problem with <br />that. But if it’s anything other than that, I do have a problem with that. <br />WATANABE: Do we have any further -. Mr. Yuen. <br />YUEN: Yeah, if I can discuss that. I think it is their intent to have what you call a <br />labor camp in that they would have workers there that would be taken to other people’s farms <br />and pick coffee and they could leave the coffee in a bag and other farmer could take it wherever <br />they want to process it. And what you’re suggesting on a limitation, it’s similar to the limitation <br />that we believe a law has on what the Department can do administratively. Administratively we <br />allow employee housing; so we allow the farmer’s employees with this Employee Housing <br />Agreement to have more employees and house them on their property without going through the <br />scrutiny of a special permit. However, we do support having a special permit for farm worker <br />housing to allow farm worker housing through the special permit process that can be used <br />generally. And the purpose of that is to deal with potential impacts. So I think, you know, we <br />can all see that there are a lot of potential impacts. We just say establish whatever level of farm <br />worker housing without going through this kind of review. For example, we had a situation <br />where a farm contractor wanted to put 30 people into a home in Ocean View, and we said you <br />EXHIBIT B <br />3 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.