Laserfiche WebLink
the future that the access goes over. You have an agreement between Continental Pacific <br />and your Association. ThatÓs, itÓs just a suggestion that you might want to look at that <br />aspect of it. Because in the long run, Continental Pacific will be selling probably all of <br />this property and no longer be a landowner in the area; and then your dealings will be <br />with individuals who buy the property, the lots that the accesses go across. <br />GALDONES:Okay. Any further questions of any of the testifiers, Ms. Rohr? <br />THIBADEAU:Mr. Chairman? <br />GALDONES:Mr. Thibadeau? <br />THIBADEAU:Are we in a new subject now or can I ask another question? ItÓs <br />not related to fishing rights. I have a question about the total project. Is now the time? <br />GALDONES:Yes, it is. <br />THIBADEAU:Well, IÓd like clarification or understanding and it has to do with <br />fair share contribution. My understanding is that the County does not apply the fair share <br />contribution concept to this project because, according to the testimony from the attorney, <br />the CountyÓs consistent policy has been not to impose the fair share contribution if it <br />thereÓs no change in density. Is that correct? <br />YUEN:I would say thatÓs correct. What theyÓve done, they have not done <br />it for projects that reduced density. And even where they incre <br />done is deduct the number of units that you could do under your present zoning, and they <br />only charge you for the upzoned portion. So, in that case, this would also result in no fair <br />share contribution. So the Department is not recommending that a condition like that be <br />put on this application. Because with respect to the rezoned area, they could build more <br />residential units under the present zoning than under the zoning theyÓre requesting. <br />THIBADEAU:So the County Department does not feel thereÓs any change in the <br />density at the present time? <br />YUEN:ThereÓs a decrease, actually, in the potential build-out versus the <br />present zoning, so we do not recommend a fair share assessment. <br />THIBADEAU:And then in a build-out, you have no way of going back <br />assessing a fair share contribution, if thereÓs a major increase in the build-out, for <br />example? <br />YUEN:Right. But thatÓs controlled by the conditions of approval that <br />even, and even that, the maximum under the zoning, under the proposed zoning, would <br />be less than the maximum under the present zoning because of the CV zone. <br />THIBADEAU:Oh, okay. <br />17 <br /> <br />